| Next |
COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Sockeye Salmon Oncorhynchus nerka in Canada
Committee on the Status
of Endangered Wildlife
Comité sur la situation
des espèces en péril
COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows:
COSEWIC. 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka (Cultus population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 57 pp.
(Species at Risk Status Reports)
For additional copies contact:
c/o Canadian Wildlife Service
Ottawa ON K1A 0H3
Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport du COSEPAC de situation du saumon sockeye (saumon rouge) (Oncorhynchus nerka) (population Cultus) au Canada.
Sockeye salmon – Illustration of adult sockeye salmon (reproduced from Hart 1973).
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2003.
Catalogue No.: CW69-14/324-2003E-PDF
Sockeye salmon is one of seven species of the genus Oncorhynchus native to North America. The adults have a slender, streamlined, silvery body with faint blue-green specking on the back and weigh an average of 3 kg. They undergo a distinctive transformation of external colour and body shape during their migration from the ocean to the freshwater ecosystem where they were born and grew as juveniles (usually a lake). The head becomes pale green in colour, the body can change to a brilliant scarlet, and the males develop teeth and a sharply hooked jaw. The adults die soon after spawning and the developing embryos and juveniles remain for several years in the lake environment. Sockeye salmon exist as isolated populations and they evolve local adaptations to the freshwater environments in which they are born, juveniles rear and adults spawn.
This status report evaluates the genetically distinct population of sockeye that inhabits Cultus Lake, located in the coastal lowland portion of the Fraser River watershed in British Columbia. Cultus sockeye are genetically unique from all other sockeye populations. This includes sockeye in the upper Fraser that originated from different glacial refugia, as well as sockeye in the lower Fraser with whom they share a common ancestry. Cultus sockeye have many adaptations for survival in their local lake environment; these adaptations further distinguish them from other sockeye in the Fraser River and in other parts of their range. Attempts to introduce non-native populations of sockeye into Cultus Lake have failed; this suggests that Cultus sockeye are probably irreplaceable. Because of their isolation and their genetic and adaptive divergence from all other sockeye populations, the sockeye of Cultus Lake form a distinct unit.
As a species, sockeye salmon are distributed through the North Pacific Ocean and its tributary systems in both Asia and North America; however, they are primarily abundant in Alaska and British Columbia (BC). The Fraser River watershed is the major habitat for sockeye in BC and supports the largest number of populations and individuals in the world. The population of Cultus Lake sockeye is located near the coast, in the eastern Fraser Valley of the Fraser River watershed, near the Canada-US international boundary and approximately 112 km upstream from the Strait of Georgia. About one-half of the life-cycle of Cultus sockeye is spent in Cultus Lake, while the other half is spent in the north Pacific Ocean near Alaska.
Cultus sockeye exclusively utilize the habitat of Cultus Lake for their breeding, egg incubation and juvenile rearing. Cultus Lake is a short, narrow lake with a relatively small littoral area, warm temperature and a strong and prolonged thermocline. Its seasonal average photosynthetic rate is the highest of any sockeye lake in the Fraser system. Its productive zooplankton community has exceptional food resources for juvenile sockeye. The lake’s water source is from a number of small, local streams; it drains into Sweltzer Creek, which joins the Vedder River that enters the Fraser River and eventually drains into the ocean. Smolts utilize this river habitat during their migration to the ocean; they grow into adults during the time spent in the north Pacific including ocean waters near Alaska. The adults then migrate back to coastal BC, enter the Fraser River and enter Cultus Lake. Usually, one and a half years are spent in the habitat of Cultus Lake, and two and a half years in the habitat of the ocean.
Most Cultus sockeye become mature in their fourth year of life. The adults return from the open ocean near Alaska, and enter the BC Strait of Georgia in August. Their normal behaviour has been to remain in the Strait for up to eight weeks before resuming their migration. They typically enter the Fraser River and Cultus Lake in September to December. Recently, however, migration into the Fraser River and Cultus Lake has been advanced; they have been migrating into freshwater as early as August and this has led to increased levels of adult mortality.
Cultus sockeye breed exclusively in the lake and die after spawning; the carcasses contribute organic enrichment and other nutrients to the lake. Fry emerge from the gravel in the spring and immediately school and move into deeper water. The juveniles are distributed throughout the limnetic zone and are exposed to dense predator populations that include northern pikeminnow, coho salmon, trout, Dolly Varden char and sculpins. They are usually resident in the lake for one and sometimes two years, and then migrate from late March to June as smolts to the ocean. They migrate through the Fraser River and its estuary, then northward through Johnstone Strait and along the mainland coast until late fall or winter when they begin to move offshore into the Gulf of Alaska. They rear in the Gulf of Alaska with other sockeye populations for about two years before beginning the migration back to Cultus Lake.
The four-year cycle of Cultus sockeye produces largely discrete year-classes or cycles in a pattern known as cyclic dominance. These cycles are an important part of the population biology of this species. Slight variation in maturity schedules (e.g., a few individuals may mature at age three or five) creates gene flow across cycles and allows some demographic recovery. With about 94% of Cultus sockeye maturing as four-year-olds, only 6% of individuals may contribute to gene flow across cycles.
Population Sizes and Trends
The number of adult sockeye returning to Cultus Lake each year has been recorded since 1925. Abundance was generally strong but variable until the late 1960s, averaging about 20 000 adults. After the late 1960s, spawner numbers collapsed in two cycles and began a sustained decline in a third cycle. Since the early 1990s, abundance has declined dramatically on all four cycles. The average across- cycle number of adults is down to 4800; this is the lowest number ever observed (since 1925). In the last three generations (past 12 years; 1991-2002), the adult spawner population declined by 36%, a decline rate of 3.3% per year across all cycles. Including the recent increase in mortality of adults before spawning, there has been about a 92% decline in number of effective spawners (past 12 years). The number of spawning adults is now a small fraction of the most conservative estimate of the capacity of the habitat (56 to 115 thousand spawning adults). The number of fry and smolt has also declined.
From 1995 through 2002, the migration of Cultus and other late-run sockeye from the Strait of Georgia into the Fraser River became progressively earlier. While the cause of the early migration is unknown, its consequences have been dramatic. The early migration has been associated with high levels of mortality along the freshwater migratory route and in terminal areas, as well as elevated levels of prespawning mortality in the natal streams and lakes. These mortalities are caused by heavy infestations of Parvicapsula minibicornis, a parasite that attacks the kidneys and gills (St-Hilaire et al. 2001). While the parasite is believed to be endemic to the system, it causes mortality only with prolonged exposures that provide the parasite a more protracted developmental period. Although Parvicapsula occurs in most Fraser River sockeye populations, it has caused significant mortality only among early migrating late-run sockeye, including Cultus sockeye.
An index of freshwater survival of juveniles shows no obvious long-term trend, except a sharp recent decline in the production of smolts per spawner that is associated with the elevated levels of adult prespawn mortality. Thus, freshwater survival of juveniles does not appear to be causing the significant collapse of the Cultus sockeye. The total survival index, which incorporates freshwater and marine life history stages, is highly variable but dropped below the replacement line during the El Nino events in the 1990s.
Limiting Factors and Threats
Over-exploitation by the fisheries, recent increases in the level of prespawn mortality associated with the early migration, and reductions in marine survival from the El Nino events in the 1990s are the primary contributors to the collapse of the Cultus sockeye. Fishery exploitation exceeded sustainable levels almost continuously for over four decades (1952-1997). The fishery annually killed an average of 67% of the adults before they spawned, when sustainable levels would be under 56%.
The prespawn mortality due to infestations of Parvicapsula minibicornis parasite is uncontrollable. The El Nino events and accompanying changes in marine survival are also uncontrollable. Therefore, the only primary contributor to the collapse that can be controlled is the fishery. In the complete absence of all further fishing, a mathematical analysis of the probability of extinction of this sockeye population under conditions of high prespawn mortality ranges from 50% in three generations (12 years) to 100% in 25 generations (100 years).
The Cultus watershed is heavily developed for recreational, residential and agricultural uses that have significantly impacted tributary streams and localized portions of the lake foreshore. Some 92% of the shoreline is now devoted to parkland. About 1.5 million visitors per year visit the lake and recreational boating is popular. Changes to the ecology of the lake are occurring; for example, water milfoil has been introduced and predation threats are possibly changing. However, these habitat impacts, while comprising a threat, are unlikely to be responsible for the collapse of the population.
Cultus sockeye are a genetically distinct, locally adapted population that serves as a keystone species for the Cultus Lake ecosystem. Adults provide organic and other nutrients from the ocean by carcass decomposition, and juveniles have a role in the lake’s food web and energy cycling through consumption of plankton and serving as prey to piscivorous fishes, birds and mammals. This population is also scientifically important due to its early role in salmon research and for possessing one of the world’s longest time series of assessment data for any sockeye population and its habitat. Finally, the population is important to many segments of Canadian society: it is fundamental to the culture and well-being of the neighbouring Soowahlie Band and the Sto:lo First Nation; it is of recreational and commercial interest to fishers; and it is of intellectual, cultural and recreational interest to many naturalists and tourists.
Existing Protection or Other Status Designations
An extensive framework of international commitments and domestic legislation and policies exist to protect Pacific salmon populations, including the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity, the Fisheries Act, federal-provincial agreements, provincial Legislation such as the Water Act, the 1998 New Directions Policy of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and the pending Wild Salmon Policy. Nevertheless, Cultus sockeye have declined until they now face possible extinction. The Pacific Salmon Commission and Fraser Panel managers took conservation steps to reduce fishery harvest levels on late-run Fraser sockeye in 2001 and 2002. This reduced the number of sockeye salmon killed and thus benefited Cultus sockeye. However, preliminary information indicated that Cultus sockeye were subjected to being killed by the fishery at a level that exceeded conservation agreements (25% in 2003 when the conservation agreement was a ceiling of 15%). On 25 October 2002, COSEWIC conducted an Emergency Assessment and listed Cultus sockeye as Endangered. In May 2003, COSEWIC further evaluated and confirmed the listing as Endangered. In the US, sockeye populations experiencing a similar collapse have been listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act, which has afforded protection against further take.
Summary of Status Report
Cultus Lake sockeye is a genetically unique population that is important from ecosystem, scientific and cultural perspectives. It has collapsed over the last three generations (1991-2002; declines in adult spawner population and total reproductive potential of 36% and 92%, respectively) primarily due to over-harvest of adults by the fisheries, an increase in adult mortality associated with parasite infestation, and reductions in marine survival. Deterioration of the lake habitat is a threat but appears not to have caused the collapse. At current low abundances, the population is highly vulnerable to human impact and random environmental events. Without any further fishing pressure, under conditions of high prespawn mortality the probability of extinction ranges from 50% in three generations (12 years) to 100% in 25 generations (100 years).
The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) determines the national status of wild species, subspecies, varieties, and nationally significant populations that are considered to be at risk in Canada. Designations are made on all native species for the following taxonomic groups: mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, lepidopterans, molluscs, vascular plants, lichens, and mosses.
COSEWIC comprises representatives from each provincial and territorial government wildlife agency, four federal agencies (Canadian Wildlife Service, Parks Canada Agency, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and the Federal Biosystematic Partnership), three nonjurisdictional members and the co-chairs of the species specialist groups. The committee meets to consider status reports on candidate species.
- Any indigenous species, subspecies, variety, or geographically defined population of wild fauna and flora.
- Extinct (X)
- A species that no longer exists.
- Extirpated (XT)
- A species no longer existing in the wild in Canada, but occurring elsewhere.
- Endangered (E)
- A species facing imminent extirpation or extinction.
- Threatened (T)
- A species likely to become endangered if limiting factors are not reversed.
- Special Concern (SC)*
- A species of special concern because of characteristics that make it particularly sensitive to human activities or natural events.
- Not at Risk (NAR)**
- A species that has been evaluated and found to be not at risk.
- Data Deficient (DD)***
- A species for which there is insufficient scientific information to support status designation.
The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) was created in 1977 as a result of a recommendation at the Federal-Provincial Wildlife Conference held in 1976. It arose from the need for a single, official, scientifically sound, national listing of wildlife species at risk. In 1978, COSEWIC designated its first species and produced its first list of Canadian species at risk. Species designated at meetings of the full committee are added to the list.
COSEWIC Status Report on the
- Species Information
- Cultus Sockeye Fishery
- Population Sizes and Trends
- Limiting Factors and Threats
- Special Significance of the Species
- Existing Protection or Other Status
- Summary of Status Report
- Technical Summary
- Literature Cited
- Biographical Summary of Contractor
List of Figures
- Figure 1: Drawing of an Adult Sockeye Salmon
- Figure 2: Distribution of Sockeye Salmon Populations along the Coast of the North Pacific Ocean
- Figure 3: Distribution of Sockeye Salmon Populations in the Fraser River System
- Figure 4: Map of Cultus Lake, Including Locations of the Six Historic and Single
- Figure 5: Annual Numbers of Adults Entering Cultus Lake and Spawning Success Estimates for Cultus sockeye Adults, 1925-2002
- Figure 6: Annual Numbers of Adults Entering Cultus Lake and the Proportion of the Adult Population Killed in Fisheries for Cultus Sockeye Adults on the 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 Cycles
- Figure 7: Annual and One-generation Smoothed Abundance Estimates for the Total Number of Adults Counted through the Sweltzer Creek Enumeration Fence over the last Three Generations
- Figure 8: Annual and One-generation Smoothed Abundance Estimates for the Estimated Population of Effective Adult Spawners over the Last Three Generations
- Figure 9: Average Timing of the Migration of Sockeye Adults into Cultus Lake
- Figure 10: Cultus Sockeye Smolt Abundance and Freshwater Survival Index, 1924-2001
- Figure 11: Total Number of Adults in the Population, Number of Adults Killed by the Fishery, Number of Adults Entering Cultus Lake and Human Exploitation Rate (catch/total) (line graph) for Cultus Sockeye Salmon, 1952-2002
- Figure 12: Cultus Sockeye Marine Survival Rate by Brood Year, 1951-1990
- Figure 13: Time Series of Recruits-per-spawner (R/S) for Cultus Sockeye Adults, where Recruits are the Total Number of Adults in the Population and Spawners are the Number of Adults Entering Cultus Lake in the Parental Generation, 1948-1997
List of Tables
- Table 1: FST Values for 14 Microsatellite Loci and one MHC Locus between the Cultus Sockeye Population and Populations in 45 other Locations in the Fraser River System
- Table 2: Total Numbers of Adult Sockeye Entering Cultus Lake by Cycle Year, 1925-2002
- Table 3: Annual Total Adult Population, Number Killed in Fisheries, Number Entering Cultus Lake and Human Exploitation Rate by Cycle for Cultus Sockeye, 1952-2002
- Table 4: Freshwater, Marine and Total Survival Indices and Exploitation Rates at Maximum Sustainable Production for Cultus, Chilko and Adams Sockeye
- Table 5: Predicted Number of Cultus Sockeye Adults Entering Cultus Lake at Different Levels of Prespawn Mortality and Exploitation Rates
- Table 6: Mean Probability of Demographic Extinction for Cultus Sockeye at Different Levels of Prespawn Mortality and Exploitation Rates After 3, 5, 10 And 25 Generations
List of Appendices
- Appendix 1: Annual Number of Jacks and Adult Male and Female Sockeye Entering Cultus Lake, Female Spawning Success and Estimated Prespawn Mortality, 1925-2002
- Appendix 2: Annual Cultus Sockeye Migration Timing Through the Sweltzer Creek Enumeration Fence, Period of Peak Spawning Activity and Average Female Fecundity, 1925-2002
- Appendix 3: Brood Year Adult Escapement in Year N, Fall Fry Population Estimate in Year n+1, Smolt Population Estimates in Years n+2 And n+3, and Freshwater Survival Indices for Cultus Sockeye, 1923-2001
- Appendix 4: Annual Total Adult Population, Number Killed in Fisheries, Number Entering Cultus Lake and Human Exploitation Rate for Cultus Sockeye 1952-2002
- Appendix 5: Age-1 Smolt Production, Subsequent Catch and Escapement at Ages 42 and 52, and Marine Survival of Cultus Sockeye for the 1951-2001 Brood Years
- Appendix 6: Brood Year Escapement, Subsequent Return by Age in the Catch and Escapement, and Returns Per Adult Entering Cultus Lake in the Parental Generation for Cultus Sockeye Adults, 1948-1999 Brood Years
Cultus sockeye are one of the most intensively studied salmon populations in the world. Research on spawner abundance, lake characteristics and juvenile production began with scientists at the Pacific Biological Station in the 1920’s (e.g., Foerster 1929a, 1929b, 1929c, 1934, 1936; Ricker 1935, 1937, 1938c) and has continued with the work of the International Pacific Salmon Fisheries Commission (e.g., Howard 1948; Cooper 1952) and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) (e.g., Ricker 1952). DFO has maintained a field laboratory and research program on the shore of Cultus Lake since 1925. Thus, there are a wealth of data on lake limnology and fish community structure as well as abundance information for the sockeye fry, smolt and adult life stages, upon which this report is based.
The scientific name Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum, 1792) derives from the Greek roots onchos (hook) and rynchos (snout), and nerka, a Russian common name for the species (Hart 1973). It is one of a group of seven species of the genus Oncorhynchus native to North America. The name sockeye, a corruption of the Coast Salish word sukkai (Hart 1973), is the most frequently used common name for the species. Other common names are red salmon (Alaska), blueback salmon (Columbia River), nerka and krasnaya ryba (Russia), and benizake and benimasu (Japan) (Burgner 1991). The French common name is saumon rouge.
Sockeye can be distinguished from other species of the family Salmonidae by the 13 to 19 rays in the anal fin that are common to all Pacific salmon, and from other Pacific salmon species by the 28 to 40 long, slender, closely spaced gill rakers on the first arch, the few pyloric caeca, and the fine speckling on the back (Fig. 1). Juvenile sockeye have a slender, elongate body with elliptical or oval parr marks that extend little if at all below the lateral line. Adult sockeye have a slender, streamlined, silvery body with faint blue-green specking on the back; weight in Canada averages 3 kg but can reach over 6 kg. During maturation, they undergo a distinctive transformation of external colour and body shape; the head becomes pale green while the body changes to a dull, brownish red that later becomes a brilliant scarlet in some populations. Males develop teeth and a hooked jaw, while females largely retain their marine body shape. Detailed descriptions can be found in Foerster (1968), Hart (1973) and Burgner (1991).
Reproduced from Hart 1973.
Canada’s Species at Risk Act (SARA) defines a wildlife species as a species, subspecies, variety, or geographically or genetically distinct population. The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) interprets such populations to be Nationally Significant Populations. In the United States, the application of the Endangered Species Act to Pacific salmon uses the criteria of Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) (Waples 1991), i.e., a population that: a) shows substantial reproductive isolation, where the degree of isolation is sufficient to allow important differences to accrue to individual populations; and b) is an important component of the evolutionary legacy of the species, i.e., its phenotypic life history traits reflect local adaptations of evolutionary importance (Waples 1991). In an application of these criteria to sockeye in Washington and Oregon states, the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service concluded that all of the populations (six) for which sufficient data are available constitute ESU’s (Gustafson et al. 1997). Below, I describe the Cultus sockeye population in terms of reproductive isolation, local adaptation and evolutionary importance.
Reproductive isolation: The genetic structure of North American sockeye populations is determined both by their ancestral origin during the last glaciation and by the nursery lake in which the juveniles rear (Wood 1995). Sockeye stocks up and downstream of the Fraser Canyon are genetically distinct based on mitochondrial, allozyme and microsatellite data (Wood et al. 1994; Bickham et al. 1995; Withler et al. 2000). A comparison of genetic differentiation with geographic distance shows that genetic and geographic distances are not related (Withler et al. 2000). Rather, differences reflect an independent post-glacial colonization of the lower Fraser from the Bering refuge and the upper Fraser from the Columbia refuge (Wood et al. 1994). Specific studies on population structure derived from the DAB-b1 MHC locus (Miller et al. 2001) and six microsatellites among 30 populations (Withler et al. 2000) shows significant differentiation among lower Fraser populations, with Cultus being the most distinctive. The population most similar to Cultus sockeye is the Chilliwack, which is located in the same tributary system but is isolated from Cultus by distinctly different breeding seasons.
In common with most other Fraser sockeye nursery lakes, there were several transplants early in the twentieth century of other sockeye populations into Cultus Lake (Aro 1979). Several million Birkenhead fry were released in 1920-1922, and similar numbers of Harrison and Pitt fry may have been released in 1915. The Cultus population, however, shows no evidence of genetic introgression with Birkenhead, Harrison or Pitt sockeye (R. Withler, DFO, Pacific Biological Station, pers. comm.). Therefore, these transplant attempts probably failed. By contrast, two other transplants in the Fraser system, of multiple sockeye stocks to Upper Adams River and Fennell Creek, resulted in genetic similarities at microsatellite loci between the host and introduced populations (Withler et al. 2000). Consequently, if the Cultus transplants had been successful, it is likely that the genetic similarities would have been revealed in the microsatellite analyses.
Additional genetic loci (14 microsatellite loci and one major histocompatibility complex locus, MHC) and an extended range of baseline populations (13 000 samples from 46 populations) have been recently analyzed (T. Beacham, DFO, Pacific Biological Station, pers. comm.). Genetic differentiation (reproductive isolation) has been quantified using the co-ancestry coefficient, FST1, calculated using GDA software (Lewis and Zaykin 2001). FST statistics at the microsatellite loci are generally above 0.10 for most comparisons with Cultus (range: 0.094 (Chilliwack) to 0.191 (Cayenne)) (Table 1), a value that would be expected for pairs of populations exchanging no more than three effective spawners per generation. This indicates a significant level of genetic differentiation between Cultus and all other populations, including Chilliwack.2 Differentiation is even more marked at the single MHC locus, with most FST values greater than 0.20 (range: 0.006 (Pitt) to 0.646 (Kynoch)). This shows that Cultus is genetically distinct both at neutral loci such as microsatellites and at a locus under selection such as MHC, and confirms the results from previous allozyme loci and mitrochondrial DNA analyses. Cultus sockeye, therefore, constitute a genetically very distinct and unique population in British Columbia.
Local adaptation: Cultus sockeye possess many adaptations for their local environment: a) on their spawning migration, Cultus sockeye delay in the Fraser estuary for up to eight weeks before resuming their migration into the river, a behavior that is unique to the 50 populations that comprise the Fraser late run sockeye group. This delay reduces exposure to adverse freshwater environments but permits breeding when environmental conditions optimize egg, alevin and fry survivals; b) Cultus adults remain in the lake for as long as three months before breeding, holding in local environments that are much cooler than those along the freshwater migratory pathway; c) breeding occurs over two months and extends beyond the normal range for other populations. Brannon (1987) hypothesizes that the protracted spawning period is an adaptation of populations in ecosystems with highly variable spring weather and constant-temperature incubation environments. Under these conditions, variation in emergence timing is related primarily to the time of egg deposition (although Cultus incubation times are progressively shorter for later spawners thereby compressing the fry emergence period). Different parts of the emergence curve are favoured sufficiently often to sustain their associated spawning times; and d) the behaviour of fry, which school and move offshore into deeper water immediately after emergence, is an atypical behaviour for Fraser sockeye that is likely an adaptation to the dense predator populations of Cultus Lake (Brannon 1967).
Evolutionary importance: Many attempts were made in the twentieth century to establish self-sustaining populations of anadromous salmonids by transplanting existing populations to new areas. In most cases, transplant attempts within the species’ native range were unsuccessful. It is believed the lack of success is due to incompatibilities between the adaptations of the donor populations and the requirements of the recipient environments (Withler 1982). Despite widespread attempts to transplant Fraser sockeye (Aro 1979), self-sustaining populations have been established in only two locations and required decades of effort (Williams 1987; Wood 1995). Attempts to introduce non-native sockeye into Cultus Lake were unsuccessful. This indicates that Cultus sockeye, which have been an evolutionarily unique lineage for thousands of years during which adaptations to Cultus Lake were evolved, are unlikely to be replaceable in the near future.
Sockeye salmon are distributed as a species in the temperate and sub-arctic waters of the North Pacific Ocean and the Bering Sea and Sea of Okhotsk (Fig. 2) (Burgner 1991). In Asia, the spawning distribution extends to the Kamchatka Peninsula and the northern part of the Sea of Okhotsk. In North America, they range from the Columbia River in the south to Kotzebue Sound in Alaska, and to the western tip of the Aleutian Islands. They are abundant primarily in British Columbia (especially the Fraser River) and in Alaska (especially Bristol Bay).
Sockeye salmon typically occur in river systems of British Columbia that contain lakes that are accessible to the Pacific Ocean. Juveniles, on their seaward smolt migration, and adults, on their upstream spawning migration, move between the freshwater and marine habitats. The Fraser is the largest river in western Canada (Fig. 3). More sockeye utilize the Fraser than any other river system in the world (Northcote and Larkin 1989). It supports more than 150 populations that management agencies divide into four groups based on the timing of the adult migration in the lower river: the early run (late June to late July); the early summer run (mid-July to mid-August); the summer run (mid-July to early September); and the late run (early September to mid-October). The late run comprises over 50 populations that spawn in the lower Fraser, Harrison-Lillooet, Seton-Anderson and South Thompson systems (Fig. 3). It includes the Birkenhead, Harrison, Weaver, Portage, Shuswap, Adams and Cultus populations. While these groups are a somewhat arbitrary application of divisions to a continuum of run timings, they reflect migration adaptations that are useful in the fishery management process.
Reproduced from Burgner 1991.
Cultus sockeye spawn exclusively in a small (6.3 km2) coastal lake that lies in a short (4.8 km), narrow (1.3 km) basin located at an elevation of 43 m near the Canada-U.S. international boundary. The lake is part of the Vedder-Chilliwack System located in the eastern Fraser Valley approximately 112 km upstream from the Strait of Georgia (Fig. 3). The closest city is Vancouver, and the closest town is Chilliwack. The adults die in the lake following breeding, while the eggs, fry and juveniles reside in the lake until emigration as smolts. Year classes overlap, thus there is a continuous population of young Cultus sockeye in this nursery lake. When the smolts emigrate from the lake, they use the lower Fraser River and its estuary to reach the ocean where the adults are distributed as described under habitat.
The presence of sockeye is shown by heavy black. Cultus Lake is highlighted with an arrow.
Sockeye salmon is primarily an anadromous species that depends on freshwater environments for spawning, egg incubation, juvenile rearing and smoltification, and marine environments for growth and maturation (Burgner 1991). Over its global distribution, the species has adapted to diverse thermal and hydrographic regimes, water chemistry and ecosystems in a variety of geoclimatic zones, latitudes and elevations. Sockeye are distinct from other salmon species in that their spawning habitat is usually near lakes (although some populations have adapted to a strictly riverine freshwater environment). Adults typically spawn in lake tributaries or outflows or along lake foreshores, which enables juveniles to rear in the lake limnetic zone before they smoltify and migrate to sea. Nest sites are in gravel that is small enough to be dislodged by the female but of sufficient size to permit an adequate circulation of well oxygenated water. They may use substrates that range from coarse sand to large angular rubble and boulders. Water depth can range from 0.1 meters in small tributary streams to over 30 m in lakes, and water temperature can range from 2 to 8° C. After constructing the nest, the eggs are deposited and fertilized, then buried by the female in gravel to a depth of 15-20 cm.
In Cultus Lake, sockeye spawn exclusively along the lake foreshore (Fig. 4). Spawning occurs at a depth of 0.5 to 6 m in substrates consisting of weathered shale alluvial materials that extend 60 m from shore (Brannon 1967). Groundwater percolates through much of the spawning area at a constant year-round temperature of 8°C, among the warmest spawning and incubation environments used by Fraser sockeye. Percolation is poorer in the peripheral areas, reducing oxygen availability and temperatures.
After emergence, the fry migrate to foraging and rearing areas in Cultus Lake where they spend one to three years. In general, juvenile sockeye growth and survival depends on a complex interaction of the lake’s morphometric (area, volume, depth), edaphic (chlorophyll-a, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, total dissolved solids) and climatic (temperature, wind, solar radiation) characteristics (Northcote and Larkin 1956). Cultus Lake can be characterized from data collected in the 1930’s, 1960’s and 1970’s, and in 2001 (Ricker 1937; Goodlad et al. 1974; Shortreed and Morton, unpublished). The lake has a surface area of 6.3 km2, a drainage basin of 65 km2, and a mean and maximum depth of 32 m and 41 m, respectively. It is steep-sided and has a littoral area (i.e., the zone where light penetrates to the bottom) of only 12% of the total surface area. Like most coastal British Columbia lakes, Cultus is a warm monomictic lake (i.e., it is thermally stratified except during the winter overturn) with a strong and prolonged thermocline. Summer temperatures in the surface layer (the epilimnion) exceed 20º C, while bottom temperatures in the fall average less than 7º C. Water clarity is relatively high (Secchi disk depth averages 10-11 m), with an average euphotic zone (where light intensity permits net primary production) of twice the depth of the thermocline. Relative to other British Columbia sockeye nursery lakes, Cultus is well buffered and alkaline, with high conductivity, total dissolved solids, and nutrient loading levels (although epilimnetic nitrate concentrations decline to very low levels from August to October). Its seasonal average photosynthetic rate is the highest of any sockeye nursery lake in the Fraser system. While some characteristics make the lake less than ideal as a sockeye nursery area (e.g., warm epilimnion, predator abundance), with its productive zooplankton community that includes abundant Daphnia, Cultus has exceptional food resources for juvenile sockeye. The lake is deep enough to have a substantial, cool hypolimnion (some of which is within the euphotic zone) that provides a favourable rearing environment. While the warm summer epilimnion temperatures and a relatively small late fall fry suggest that a substantial proportion of the zooplankton community may not be accessible to juvenile sockeye, the relatively long growing season permits considerable overwinter growth.
Only Lindell Beach is used today.
Cultus Lake supports a somewhat simple fish community that includes six species of Pacific salmon, chinook (O. tshawytscha), coho (O. kisutch), chum (O. keta), pink (O. gorbuscha), coastal cutthroat trout (O. clarki clarki), and both steelhead and rainbow trout (O. mykiss), as well as Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma), Cultus pygmy sculpin (Cottus sp.), prickly sculpin (C. asper), threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), largescale sucker (Catostomus macrocheilus), longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae), mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni), northern pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus oregonensis), peamouth chub (Mylocheilus caurinus), redside shiner (Richardsonius balteatus) and western brook lamprey (Lampetra richardsoni). The Cultus pygmy sculpin, a strictly limnetic species that evolved from the stream rearing coastrange sculpin (C. aleuticus) (Cannings and Ptolemy 1998), has adapted to the limnetic life-cycle by reducing bone density and increasing sub-dermal lipids to allow vertical migration in the water column. It is listed by COSEWIC as threatened and by the Province of British Columbia as critically imperiled (Cannings et al. 1994) due to its single known location in Cultus Lake.
Increases in spring water temperature and day length cause sockeye juveniles to undergo smoltification and to emigrate from the lake. They emigrate via Sweltzer Creek, a short (3 km) river with an average discharge of only 3.5 m3/s. Fraser sockeye smolts move quickly through the Fraser estuary and into the Strait of Georgia in April and May (Healey 1980). They migrate northward through Johnstone Strait by July, then northwest along the coast until late fall or winter when they begin to move offshore into the Gulf of Alaska where they rear with other sockeye stocks for about two years. The timing of the offshore movement is affected by a complex interplay of physical (temperature, salinity), biological (age, size, prey abundance) and genetic (disposition to specific migratory patterns) factors (Burgner 1991). North American sockeye utilize the area south and east of Kodiak Island, with Fraser sockeye distributed further south (to 46º N) (Burgner 1991). Their distributions, while predictable in a general way, have not been reliably linked to major oceanographic features such as circulation patterns and temperature and salinity fronts (Burgner 1991). Cultus sockeye are vulnerable to the impacts of human development during their smolt emigration and migration through near-shore coastal waters. The lower Fraser River is heavily developed as it passes through a community of over two million people: the estuary has been encroached by development and is constrained by dykes and river entrainment structures; and effluent from pulp mills and small communities is common along the coast. There is also a growing number of fish farms on the marine migratory pathway of juvenile sockeye as they move north along the coast of British Columbia. Concerns have recently been expressed regarding the potential transfer of diseases and parasites such as sea lice between salmon farms and wild populations, especially in areas of dense salmon farming (Gardner and Peterson 2003).
In general, sockeye exhibit a greater variety of life history patterns among populations than is typical for other members of the genus Oncorhynchus, probably because of the frequent use of lakes for juvenile rearing habitat. This requires specific adaptive behaviours for adults and offspring to suit individual lake conditions. Such behaviours include adult homing to spawning areas that is spatially more precise than is typical for Pacific salmon because emergent fry must be adapted to migrating in a specific direction to reach the rearing lake, adult spawning timing to produce offspring that develop at optimal times of the year for the lake’s food resources, as well as the adaptations of the embryos and juveniles themselves to the biotic and abiotic characteristics of each lake. The evolution of these adaptations in sockeye adults and juveniles is made possible because of the isolation associated with lake spawning and rearing, which creates divergence among sockeye gene pools. These individual gene pools, therefore, are able to evolve adaptations to the specific local conditions.
The sockeye breeding period ranges from July to January, but occurs most frequently in August and September. Eggs are deposited in nests, termed redds, constructed by the female, fertilized by an accompanying male (or an opportunistic precocious male), then covered with gravel by the female. The eggs incubate in the gravel through the winter and until the yolk sac is absorbed in the spring. Ambient temperatures mediate incubation duration and the timing of emergence; emergence occurs in darkness. Progeny from river spawners show either positive or negative rheotaxis depending on the orientation of the spawning area to the lake, while those from lake spawners move into shallow water before progressively moving offshore. They utilize lake rearing areas for one to three years where they compete among themselves and with other species (e.g., redside shiner, threespine stickleback) for food such as insects and zooplankton, and serve as prey to resident species (e.g., Northern pikeminnow, salmonids). Juveniles smoltify and emigrate to sea from March to June. They remain at sea for one to four years, but more typically for two to three years, before the onset of maturation and the return to the natal area. Those returning after one year, termed precocious (predominantly jacks (male) but sometimes jills (female)), are much smaller; those returning as adults after two or more years are much larger, having increased several fold in weight. Like other Pacific salmon species, sockeye die and decompose after spawning, thereby transferring biogenic nutrients from the marine to the freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems.
Cultus sockeye mature predominantly in their fourth year of life (typically after about two years in freshwater and two years in marine environments). The population exhibits a quadrennial adult abundance pattern typified by a strong dominate cycle (expected in 2003), a moderate sub-dominant cycle (2002) and two numerically weak cycles (2000 and 2001). Normally, Fraser summer and late run sockeye populations (including Cultus) migrate from the open ocean into the Strait of Georgia between Vancouver Island and the mainland in August. The summer run populations continue their migration into the river, while the late run holds in the Strait for up to eight weeks, a delay that is not typical of stocks in other timing groups or river systems. Because the local environmental conditions require a later breeding period for late run populations, the delay is likely an adaptation that permits them to migrate from the open ocean at the prescribed time but limits their exposure to adverse conditions in freshwater environments. The migration into the Fraser River normally begins in September and October, and into Cultus Lake from late September to early December, a protracted period of about eight to ten weeks that is considerably longer (by 2-6 weeks) than that of most other Fraser River sockeye populations (Schubert 1998). From 1995-2002, the migration of late run sockeye into the Fraser River has been progressively earlier. In the most extreme case (2000), there was an almost uninterrupted migration from the Strait of Georgia into the Fraser River; Cultus sockeye began migrating into the Fraser River in August. While the cause of the early migration is currently unknown, its consequences have been dramatic. The early migration has been associated with high levels of mortality along the migratory route and in terminal areas, as well as elevated levels of prespawning mortality (PSM) in the natal streams and lakes. These mortalities are caused by heavy infestations of the freshwater parasite Parvicapsula minibicornis that attacks and destroys the kidneys and gills (St-Hilaire et al. 2001). While the parasite is believed to be endemic to the system, it causes mortality only with prolonged exposures that provide the parasite a more protracted developmental period. Consequently, although the parasite occurs in most Fraser River sockeye populations, it has caused significant mortality only among early migrating late-run sockeye, including Cultus.
Cultus sockeye spawn from late November through December, the latest spawning of all the Fraser sockeye populations (Schubert 1998). The pre-spawning behaviour and distribution of sockeye in Cultus Lake has not been documented. Historically, spawning has occurred along the lake foreshore at Lindell Beach, Snag Point, Spring Hole and Mallard Bay (Foerster 1929a) as well as in Sweltzer and Spring creeks (Howard 1948); however, recent spawning has been primarily confined to the lake foreshore at Lindell Beach (Fig. 4). While lake spawning is known in many sockeye populations, few other than Cultus spawn almost exclusively in the lake. Spawning occurs in upwelling groundwater that in peripheral areas can be lower in oxygen and pH, possibly requiring embryo adaptations that may include small eggs, higher pigmentation and a dense network of capillaries covering the yoke sac (Burgner 1991).
The time required for the incubation of Cultus sockeye eggs decreases with spawning date, a unique adaptation to the population’s protracted spawning period and constant incubation temperatures that reduces the range of emergence times (Brannon 1987). Despite this adaptation, fry emergence from the gravel remains protracted (April to July), reflecting the variation in incubation environments (peripheral areas have lower flows, less aeration) as well as the lengthy spawning period (Brannon 1967); emergence peaks in early to mid May. The fry school and move offshore into deeper water immediately after emergence, an atypical behaviour for Fraser sockeye that Brannon hypothesizes is an adaptation to the dense predator populations in Cultus Lake. Lake predators include salmonids such as coho and trout, as well as Dolly Varden char, northern pikeminnow and sculpins (Ricker 1941). Northern pikeminnow, while not the most voracious predator in the lake, can have a substantial impact on sockeye due to their abundance. The control of such predators can increase the survival of juvenile salmonids (Firesen and Ward 1999; Jeppson and Platts 1959). Two such control projects were conducted in Cultus Lake. The first was in the 1930’s after Foerster (1938) documented high mortality among sockeye juveniles and Ricker (1933) demonstrated that predation by piscivorous fish was an important causal factor. They reduced the char and large pikeminnow populations by 90% over four years and reported a three-fold increase in sockeye freshwater survival (from 3.1% to 10.0%) and an increase in sockeye smolt size (Foerster and Ricker 1941). The second project, in 1990-1992 (Levy 1990; Hall 1992), also was associated with increased freshwater survival (from 70 to 100 smolts/spawner).
Newly emergent fry move into deeper water as early as April; most of the population is well offshore by May (Mueller and Enzenhofer 1991). They can rear in the lake for up to two summers (one is most common) and migrate as one or two-year-old smolts. A small proportion may residualize, remaining in the lake for their entire life cycle (Ricker 1938a, 1959). While both residual sockeye and kokanee remain exclusively in freshwater, residuals differ from kokanee in that they are the progeny of anadromous parents.
Planktonic crustacea are the most important food; Epischura sp., Diacyclops bicuspidatus, Daphnia sp. and Eubosmina coregoni are predominant in the lake (Foerster 1925; Ricker 1938b). Diacyclops is most important in winter and spring, and Daphnia in summer and autumn; Eubosmina is commonly taken by the youngest sockeye (Hartman and Burgner 1972). From June to November, sockeye fry are distributed throughout the limnetic zone. When the lake is thermally stratified, the nighttime distribution of sockeye is generally in a layer 5-10 m deep and just below the thermocline. As the thermocline weakens in the fall, the fry layer becomes wider and somewhat deeper. During the day, fry are presumably on the bottom because daytime acoustic transects detect very few fry-size targets in the water column (J. Hume, DFO, Cultus Lake Laboratory, pers. comm.).
The smolt migration from Cultus Lake begins in late March and continues into June. Following a period of ocean residency (see Habitat), they mature primarily as four-year-olds, although small proportions also mature after one winter at sea as three-year-old jacks or three winters at sea as five-year-old adults. Maturing sockeye migrate from the north Pacific Ocean during the summer, making their landfall along a broad section of the coast before entering the Strait of Georgia in August through either Johnstone or Juan de Fuca straits. The proportion that migrates through Johnstone Strait is higher in El Nino years when warmer sea surface temperatures extend north into coastal B.C.
Adult Cultus sockeye can be captured and killed by the fishery along the full extent of their migratory pathway, from the point of landfall along the coast until their entry onto the spawning grounds. The majority of the capture of adults is in large mixed-stock ocean seine, gillnet and troll fisheries, although a significant proportion can be killed in the Fraser River fisheries. Throughout the history of the Fraser River sockeye fishery, Cultus sockeye have not been managed as a discrete population with its own targeted level of capture and killing. The policy used by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) has been to set capture levels based on the largest or most productive populations of sockeye even if smaller or less productive populations share the same migration timing. Populations such as Cultus sockeye, which are in the same fall-run as the larger and more productive Weaver and Adams River sockeye populations, experience a higher rate of adult killing than can be replaced by the population. The policy acknowledges that less productive populations of sockeye may not achieve their maximum population size, but assumes that they will stabilize at a smaller population size.
The extensive studies of Cultus sockeye since the 1920’s allow the presentation in this status report of population sizes and trends for adult escapement (1925-2002), fry (1986-2002) and smolt (1926-2003) populations, harvest and total return (1952-2002), freshwater (1925-2001), marine (1954-2001) and total (1948-1999) survival and exploitation rates (1952-2002). Also summarized from Schubert et al. (2002) are stock productivity and productive capacity estimates, as well as simulation results from a Bayesian stock-recruitment model evaluation of future stock trajectories and extinction probabilities under different scenarios of prespawn mortality and exploitation.
The number of mature adults entering Cultus Lake (“spawner abundance”) has been assessed using enumeration fences since 1925, providing a unique 78-year time series of consistent data collection using an accurate assessment tool. Spawner abundance was low and variable during a period of large scale hatchery experimentation in the 1920’s and 1930’s, very high in 1939-1942 following the removal of predators from the lake, strong but variable from the early 1940’s to the late 1960’s, and declining since the late 1960’s (Fig. 5; Table 2; Appendix 1). Abundances and patterns differ by cycle (Fig. 6). Since 1925, the number of adults entering Cultus Lake averaged 14 200 and 27 100 on the 2002 sub-dominant and 2003 dominant cycles, respectively, and 12 300 and 5 000 on the 2000 and 2001 off-cycles. Cyclic dominance largely disappeared from the 1940’s to 1960’s when abundance was similar on three cycles and relatively strong on the 2001 cycle. It re-emerged when off-cycle adult spawner abundance collapsed in the early 1970’s. Since the late 1960’s, abundance on the sub-dominant cycle has progressively declined while the dominant cycle has been trendless, although the last two cycle years have been weak. In contrast, off-cycle abundances have been very low (<2000 spawners) since the early 1970’s. The most recent populations on all cycles have been among the lowest ever recorded for Cultus sockeye, with the exception of the improved abundance (4900) on the subdominant cycle in 2002.
|Early Stuart||Kynock Creek||0.1096 (0.0705, 0.1567)||0.6456|
|Gluskie Creek||0.1107 (0.0716, 0.1620)||0.5719|
|Forfar Creek||0.1092 (0.0687, 0.1588)||0.5489|
|Dust Creek||0.1073 (0.0638, 0.1599)||0.6299|
|Porter Creek||0.1136 (0.0690, 0.1731)||0.5772|
|Hudson Bay Creek||0.1153 (0.0726, 0.1668)||0.5748|
|Blackwater Creek||0.1306 (0.0858, 0.1910)||0.5930|
|Late Stuart and Stellako||Stellako River||0.1069 (0.0687, 0.1434)||0.5850|
|Middle River||0.1039 (0.0646, 0.1489)||0.6042|
|Nadina River||0.1060 (0.0638, 0.1522)||0.5904|
|Pinchi Creek||0.1105 (0.0660, 0.1635)||0.5474|
|Tachie River||0.1044 (0.0686, 0.1415)||0.5812|
|Kuzkwa River||0.1076 (0.0691, 0.1570)||0.5596|
|Upper Mid-Fraser||Bowron River||0.1086 (0.0688, 0.1563)||0.4427|
|Chilko River||0.0994 (0.0623, 0.1401)||0.3442|
|Chilko Lake (south)||0.1162 (0.0731, 0.1641)||0.3413|
|Horsefly River (mixed)||0.1131 (0.0699, 0.1617)||0.2318|
|Lower Horsefly River||0.1148 (0.0700, 0.1689)||0.2782|
|Middle Horsefly River||0.1197 (0.0733, 0.1762)||0.2435|
|Upper Horsefly River||0.1163 (0.0720, 0.1660)||0.2454|
|Roaring River||0.1161 (0.0772, 0.1644)||0.1534|
|Wasko Creek||0.1170 (0.0768, 0.1671)||0.1369|
|Blue Lead Creek||0.1215 (0.0826, 0.1738)||0.1448|
|McKinley Creek||0.1221 (0.0732, 0.1829)||0.2653|
|Mitchell River||0.1361 (0.1000, 0.1700)||0.1276|
|Lower Mid-Fraser||Portage Creek||0.1066 (0.0650, 0.1500)||0.3834|
|Gates Creek||0.1611 (0.1161, 0.2034)||0.1871|
|Nahatlatch River||0.1153 (0.0740, 0.1649)||0.4294|
|Lower Fraser, north side||Birkenhead River||0.1116 (0.0615, 0.1777)||0.0074|
|Weaver Creek||0.0981 (0.0641, 0.1359)||0.0109|
|Big Silver Creek||0.1295 (0.0839, 0.1911)||0.0926|
|Harrison River||0.1137 (0.0683, 0.1690)||0.3138|
|Pitt River||0.1133 (0.0674, 0.1657)||0.0056|
|Lower Fraser, south side||Chilliwack River||0.0945 (0.0655, 0.1277)||0.2007|
|South Thompson||Lower Adams||0.1034 (0.0660, 0.1446)||0.3151|
|Upper Adams||0.1415 (0.0964, 0.2025)||0.1554|
|Cayenne Creek||0.1912 (0.1271, 0.2752)||0.1350|
|Lower Shuswap||0.0943 (0.0643, 0.1275)||0.2829|
|Middle Shuswap||0.0969 (0.0654, 0.1382)||0.3178|
|Little Shuswap||0.1111 (0.0763, 0.1508)||0.3018|
|Scotch Creek||0.1057 (0.0708, 0.1407)||0.2572|
|Seymour River||0.1057 (0.0709, 0.1420)||0.2475|
|Eagle River||0.1027 (0.0709, 0.1381)||0.3864|
|North Thompson||Fennell Creek||0.1053 (0.0801, 0.1349)||0.3319|
|Raft River||0.1027 (0.0709, 0.1381)||0.3864|
Data from Schubert et al. 2002.
Figure 6: Annual Numbers of Adults Entering Cultus Lake (bars) and the Proportion of the Adult Population Killed in Fisheries (% exploitation rates; lines) for Cultus Sockeye Adults on the 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 Cycles
In the last three generations (12 years; 1991-2002), the adult population entering Cultus Lake declined by 36%, a rate of 3.3% per year across all cycles (one-generation smoothed data, Fig. 7). Schubert et al. (2002) noted that this rate of decline underestimates the population’s true loss of reproductive potential because it does not consider the recent increases in mortality suffered by the adults after entering the lake but before breeding (termed prespawn mortality or PSM). PSM is assessed from internal examinations of female carcasses following spawning. Before 1995, PSM averaged only 7% and was generally less than 10% in the years with available data. Since the onset of the early migration in 1995, there have been sharp increases in PSM, to 24% in 1995, 66% in 1996, 38% in 1998 and 13% in 2002. PSM could not be measured in 1997 and 1999-2001 because few if any carcasses were recovered. For 1999-2000, Schubert et al. (2002) estimated the level of PSM by comparing the number of smolts produced per adult spawner for those brood years (5 smolts/adult) with the average number in years before the start of the early migration (67 smolts/adult). By assuming that all of the difference could be attributed to PSM, they estimated PSM was 93% in 1999 and 2000. While this assumption was probably incorrect (reduced egg viability from depressed adult fitness and depensatory fry mortality probably played a role), the analysis reasonably approximates the change in reproductive potential because all mortality sources relate to the early migration. They applied these estimates (and used averages for 1997 and 2001) to the adult population numbers entering the lake (Appendix 1) and recalculated the rate of decline in the last three generations. This analysis, updated to include the 2002 population and PSM data, shows a rate of decline of effective spawners of 92%. This substantial change is largely attributable to the reduction in reproductive potential of the 1999 dominant cycle escapement. Although there are weaknesses in the treatment of the PSM data, because the estimate for that cycle is derived from a direct assessment of the lake’s smolt production in 2001, this analysis likely produces a realistic estimate of the real change in reproductive potential during the recent era of elevated mortality prior to breeding.
Six estimates of fall fry abundance are available from mid-water trawl and hdroacoustic surveys, conducted opportunistically since 1986 by DFO’s lake assessment group (J. Hume, DFO, Cultus Lake Laboratory, pers. comm.). Population estimates for the 1980’s and early 1990’s brood years ranged from 0.5 to 2.4 million (95% C.I. ± <12%) (Appendix 3). Abundances for the 1999 and 2000 broods were considerably lower at 250 000 ± 19% and 46 000 ± 38%, respectively, the lowest of the ix sample years. Although there is a tendency for higher escapements to result in lower fall fry abundances, suggesting intraspecific competition for food, the relationship is not significant (P<0.05). The highest observed fall fry densities (2800 to 3500 fry/ha) are well with the range of observed densities in other sockeye lakes in B.C. (Shortreed et al. 2001), while the recent fry densities (1999, 2000) are the lowest yet measured among Fraser sockeye populations.
Figure 7: Annual and One-generation (four year average) Smoothed Abundance Estimates for the Total Number of Adults Counted through the Sweltzer Creek Enumeration Fence Over the Last Three Generations (12 years)
The data are shown relative to what would be 50% and 80% declines (dashed lines). Number of adults is plotted on a log scale.
Figure 8: Annual and One-generation (four year average) Smoothed Abundance Estimates for the Estimated Population of Effective Adult Spawners (fence count adjusted for prespawn mortality) Over the Last Three Generations (12 years)
The data are shown relative to what would be 50% and 80% declines (dashed lines). Number of adults is plotted on a log scale.
Figure 9: Average Timing of the Migration of Sockeye Adults into Cultus Lake: a Comparison of the Long-term Average (1941-1995) (blue solid line) and the Pattern in Recent Years (1996-2002) (red dashed line)
Three-day averages are used to reduce daily variability.
Smolt abundance has been assessed 47 times at the enumeration fence since 1926 (Appendix 3). As would be expected, smolt abundance reflects the cyclic pattern of adult abundance, with an average of 1.1 and 1.7 million on the sub-dominant and dominant cycles, respectively, and 0.7 and 0.3 million on the off cycles. Abundance averaged 983 400 over the time series, ranging from a low of 5 700 in 2002 to a high of 3 124 000 in 1937. Production was variable but strong from the 1920’s to the 1960’s (1 216 300 average), followed by declines in the 1970’s (712 700 average) and very low average abundances since 1990 (63 300) (Fig. 10). The most recent assessments report the lowest abundances on record in 2002, 2003, 2001 and 1991.
Many adult Cultus sockeye fail to return to the lake because they are killed in the fisheries (Fig. 11). Estimates of the total adult population are available since 1952 when the development of stock discrimination techniques permitted their identification in mixed stock fisheries. The 1952-2002 annual total population of Cultus adults averaged 43 100, ranging from 500 in 1977 to 282 500 in 1959 (Fig. 11; Table 3; Appendix 4). Average total adult populations have declined in each decade since the 1950’s (Table 3). Population size since 1952 varies by cycle: the 1998 sub-dominant cycle averaged 37 100 (range: 2 300 to 101 700) and declined by 8% per cycle year; the 1999 dominant cycle averaged 99 700 (range: 13 800 to 282 500) and declined by 7% per cycle year; the 2000 off-cycle averaged 25 100 (range: 2 000 to 70 900), declining from 41 500 through 1976 to only 5 900 in 1980-2000; and the 2001 off-cycle averaged 14 900 (range: 500 to 73 600), declining from 57 100 in the 1950’s to 18 900 in the 1960’s and only 2 600 since 1977. Overall returns have declined by 9% per cycle.
Fishery exploitation rate (ER), expressed as a percentage, is the number killed by the fisheries divided by the total number of adults in the population. The 1952-2002 Cultus sockeye ER’s average 67%, and range from 10% (1999) to 95% (1997) (Fig. 11; Table 3; Appendix 4). Generally, ER’s have exceeded 75%. Exceptions are in the early 1960’s when efforts were made to rebuild Adams River populations and since the 1990’s in response to concerns regarding the early migration. Beginning in 1995, ER’s decreased (with the notable exception of 1997) by over 40% to a mean of 33% as a result of conservation measures for late run stocks. In 2001 and 2002, the Fraser Panel and DFO limited fisheries on late run (excluding Birkenhead) populations to ER’s of 17% ER and 15%, respectively (ER’s of 16.5% and 14.1% were achieved). In 2003, fisheries were to be limited to a range of 15-25%, depending on the abundance of late run sockeye and the extent of the early migration. Inseason information indicates that the exploitation rate (>25%) will exceed the appropriate limit (15%).
Figure 11: Total Number of Adults in the Population (total return), Number of Adults Killed by the Fishery (light blue bar), Number of Adults Entering Cultus Lake (dark blue bar) and Human Exploitation Rate (catch/total) (line graph) for Cultus Sockeye Salmon, 1952-2002
Survival indexes can be calculated for freshwater, marine and total life history stages. The freshwater survival index relates smolt production to the total number of adults entering Cultus Lake in the brood year and is expressed as smolts per adult, i.e., it includes mortality before breeding, during incubation and as juveniles. The index for the 1925-2001 brood years averages 71 smolts/adult (range: 3-203), very similar to the Chilko Lake index, the only other wild sockeye smolt data for Fraser sockeye stocks (DFO, unpublished) (Table 4). The index decreases with spawner density, although not statistically so, and shows no obvious long-term trends (Fig. 10; Appendix 3). Just prior to the current early return phenomena (1988-1990 brood years), the index of 100 smolts/adult exceeded the long term average (possibly reflecting a predator control project in those years). There is no indication of any systematic trend until the 1999-2000 brood years when the index suddenly declined to only five smolts/adult; the 2001 brood index (22) also remained well below average.
The marine survival index, expressed as a percentage, relates the annual production of yearling smolts to the number of subsequent adults. The index for the 1951-1990 brood years averages 8.5% (range 0.5-43.9%), with higher average survivals (15.3%) in the late 1980’s. The mean marine survival for Chilko sockeye was only slightly higher (Table 4). Survival for the 1951 Cultus brood year was exceptional at 43.9%, more than twice the next highest survival. While such a deviation from average values occurs in natural systems, it could also reflect an artifact of data collection methods. If this point is removed, then the mean marine survival is reduced to 7.0% (range 0.5-20.3%), although still not significantly different from the Chilko mean (paired sample T-test, t0.05,21=1.80, p= 0.09). There is no significant trend in marine survival (Fig. 12; Appendix 5); excluding 1951, survivals averaged 6% through the 1970’s and increased to 15% in the 1988-1990 broods. Adult return estimates will not be known for the 1999-2001 brood years until 2003-2006; however, given the large size of the smolts produced by those broods, marine survival may be above average (Foerster 1954; Bradford et al. 2000).
The total survival index, expressed as adult returns per adult spawner, relates the total number of adults in the population to the number of adults counted into the lake in the parental generation. The index for the 1948-1997 brood years is highly variable, averaging 4.9 and ranging from 0.5 to 26 (Fig. 13; Appendix 6). Returns were low in the early and late 1960’s and the 1990’s, when the index dropped below the replacement line (Fig. 13; horizontal dashed line). The mean index for Cultus (4.9) is less that other Fraser sockeye populations, suggesting its productivity is lower (Table 4). The lower Cultus index is also reflected in the mean productivity parameter h*, (ER at maximum sustainable production); the h* estimate for Cultus is 0.56 (i.e., 56% ER, from standard stock-recruitment analysis), compared to greater than 0.76 for Chilko and 0.68 for the South Thompson (Adams) group.
Figure 13: Time Series of Recruits-per-spawner (R/S) for Cultus Sockeye Adults, where Recruits are the Total Number of Adults in the Population and Spawners are the Number of Adults Entering Cultus Lake in the Parental Generation, 1948-1997
The horizontal broken line is the replacement line.
Productive capacity is a measure of the breeding population abundance (the escapement) that produces the maximum sustainable numbers of subsequent adults (the recruitment). While productivity is related to productive capacity, there can be populations that are very productive but have a small productive capacity while the opposite can also be true. Schubert et al. (2002) report productive capacity estimates calculated in three ways: a Ricker stock-recruitment (SR) model fitted to the total number of adults entering Cultus Lake and size of the subsequent smolt population; a Ricker model similarly fitted to the total number of adults entering the lake and the size of the adult population that they produce; and a photosysthetic rate (PR) model (Hume et al. 1996; Shortreed et al. 2000) fitted to an estimate of the lake’s primary production. Point estimates of the productive capacity of Cultus sockeye (Smax) range from 56 000 to 115 300 effective breeders. These estimates are uncertain because they lie outside the range of the observed breeding population sizes. The largest number of adults entering the lake (47 800 in 1959), however, also produced the largest subsequent adult population (282 500) (Table 3), and escapements without associated estimates of recruitment approached this value in 1927 (82 000), 1939 (71 000) and 1940 (74 000) (Table 2). The estimates are consistent in suggesting that the population’s productive capacity is in the higher part of the range of the observed data or beyond. The mean observed numbers of adults entering the lake of 15 000 since 1925, 7 000 since 1975, and 4 000 since 1995 are much lower than any of the estimates of Smax. Since 1995, the mean population recorded at the counting fence at the lake is only 7% of the lowest estimate of Smax, while the mean number of effective spawners at 90% prespawn mortality is less than 1% of the low end of the Smax range. Regardless of the true value of Smax, the number of adults entering Cultus Lake is currently only a small fraction of the level that would utilize a substantial part of the population’s carrying capacity.
The productivity of a population has implications to both its probability of extinction and its prospects for recovery, especially when managed and harvested with other more productive populations in mixed stock fisheries. The analyses indicate that Cultus sockeye typically have been less productive than other Fraser populations: the exploitation rate at MSY (56%) is lower than for Chilko (76%) and Adams (68%), two populations with which Cultus co-migrates; the marine survival rate (7%) is lower than for the Chilko population (9%); and trends in abundance since the 1950’s are consistent with the conclusion that the number of adult Cultus sockeye will decline even in the absence of high prespawn mortalities if exploitation rates are in the 70-90% range.
Schubert et al. (2002) developed a simulation model that incorporates population-recruitment parameter uncertainties to estimate future adults spawners under a range of prespawn mortality and capture rate scenarios over three, five, ten and twenty-five generations (where a generation is four years). In this status report, the model inputs are updated to include 2002 data to project yearly average population sizes for all parameter sets and trials and report values averaged over the four cycles (Table 5). Two results are notable. First, the population is projected to continue to decline if PSM remains above 80% even if harvest is restricted to only 10%. Second, because the population is relatively unproductive and the current population is small, abundances will increase very slowly even at low levels of PSM and capture. For example, at 40% PSM and 0% ER, the average abundance is not expected to approach even the lower part of the range in productive capacity estimates for 25 generations (about 100 years).
|1998 Subdominant Cycle||1999 Dominant Cycle||2000 Off Cycle||2001 Off Cycle|
|1926||2 622||1927||82 426||1928||14 661||1929||5 084|
|1930||7 946||1931||37 473||1932||2 231||1933||2 864|
|1934||22 940||1935||15 339||1936||8 322||1937||1 227|
|1938||9 434||1939||70 789||1940||73 536||1941||13 950|
|1942||36 959||1943||11 822||1944||14 002||1945||5 030|
|1946||33 068||1947||8 699||1948||12 746||1949||9 055|
|1950||29 928||1951||12 677||1952||17 833||1953||11 543|
|1954||22 036||1955||25 922||1956||13 718||1957||20 375|
|1958||13 324||1959||47 779||1960||17 640||1961||13 396|
|1962||26 997||1963||20 303||1964||11 067||1965||2 455|
|1966||16 919||1967||33 198||1968||25 314||1969||5 942|
|1970||13 941||1971||9 128||1972||10 366||1973||641|
|1974||8 984||1975||11 349||1976||4 435||1977||82|
|1978||5 076||1979||32 031||1980||1 657||1981||256|
|1982||16 725||1983||19 944||1984||994||1985||424|
|1986||3 256||1987||32 184||1988||861||1989||418|
|1990||1 860||1991||20 157||1992||1 203||1993||1 063|
|1994||4 399||1995||10 316||1996||2 022||1997||88|
|1998||1 959||1999||12 392||2000||1 227||2001||515|
|1926-1938||10 736||1927-1939||51 507||1928-1936||8 405||1925-1937||3 650|
|1942-1966||25 604||1943-1967||22 914||1940-1968||23 232||1941-1969||10 218|
|1970-1986||9 596||1971-1987||20 927||1972-1988||3 663||1973-1989||364|
|1990-1998||2 739||1991-1999||14 288||1992-2000||1 484||1993-2001||555|
|All years||14 162||All years||27 049||All years||12 307||All years||4 969|
|1998 Sub-dominant Cycle||1999 Dominant Cycle|
|1954||79 628||22 036||101 664||78%||1955||143 195||25 922||169 117||85%|
|1958||49 162||13 324||62 486||79%||1959||234 701||47 779||282 480||83%|
|1962||20 536||26 997||47 533||43%||1963||31 541||20 303||51 844||61%|
|1966||18 564||16 919||35 483||52%||1967||98 802||33 198||132 000||75%|
|1970||26 138||13 941||40 079||65%||1971||87 978||9 128||97 106||91%|
|1974||35 813||8 984||44 797||80%||1975||36 735||11 349||48 084||76%|
|1978||22 364||5 076||27 440||82%||1979||77 620||32 031||109 651||71%|
|1982||52 386||16 725||69 111||76%||1983||87 952||19 944||107 896||82%|
|1986||9 163||3 256||12 419||74%||1987||68 537||32 184||100 721||68%|
|1990||8 540||1 860||10 400||82%||1991||44 762||20 157||64 919||69%|
|1994||18 844||4 399||23 243||81%||1995||9 026||10 316||19 342||47%|
|1998||338||1 959||2 297||15%||1999||1 436||12 392||13 828||10%|
|2002||801||4 873||5 674||14%|
|1950's||64 395||17 680||82 075||78%||1950's||188 948||36 851||225 799||84%|
|1960's||19 550||21 958||41 508||47%||1960's||65 172||26 751||91 922||71%|
|1970's||28 105||9 334||37 439||75%||1970's||67 444||17 503||84 947||79%|
|1980's||30 775||9 991||40 765||75%||1980's||78 245||26 064||104 309||75%|
|1990's||9 241||2 739||11 980||77%||1990's||18 408||14 288||32 696||56%|
|Total||26 329||10 796||37 125||71%||Total||76 857||22 892||99 749||77%|
|2000 Off-Cycle||2001 Off-Cycle|
|1952||19 987||17 833||37 820||53%||1953||29 029||11 543||40 572||72%|
|1956||23 808||13 718||37 526||63%||1957||53 208||20 375||73 583||72%|
|1960||22 304||17 640||39 944||56%||1961||14 395||13 396||27 791||52%|
|1964||13 722||11 067||24 789||55%||1965||4 349||2 455||6 804||64%|
|1968||45 539||25 314||70 853||64%||1969||16 011||5 942||21 953||73%|
|1972||38 639||10 366||49 005||79%||1973||4 390||641||5 031||87%|
|1976||26 410||4 435||30 845||86%||1977||401||82||483||83%|
|1980||4 719||1 657||6 376||74%||1981||1 201||256||1 457||82%|
|1984||5 882||994||6 876||86%||1985||541||424||965||56%|
|1988||8 924||861||9 785||91%||1989||1 679||418||2 097||80%|
|1992||6 298||1 203||7 501||84%||1993||9 808||1 063||10 871||90%|
|1996||885||2 022||2 907||30%||1997||1 512||88||1 600||95%|
|2000||797||1 227||2 024||39%||2001||102||515||617||17%|
|1950's||21 898||15 776||37 673||58%||1950's||41 119||15 959||57 078||72%|
|1960's||27 188||18 007||45 195||60%||1960's||11 585||7 264||18 849||61%|
|1970's||32 525||7 401||39 925||81%||1970's||2 396||362||2 757||87%|
|1980's||6 508||1 171||7 679||85%||1980's||1 140||366||1 506||76%|
|1990's||2 660||1 484||4 144||64%||1990's||3 807||555||4 363||87%|
|Total||16 763||8 334||25 096||67%||Total||10 510||4 400||14 910||70%|
|Freshwater survival index (smolts/spawner):|
|Annual range||3 - 203||9 - 115||-|
|Marine survival index (%):|
|Annual range||0.5% - 20.3%||1.3% - 22.2%||-|
|Total survival index (%)||4.8%||7.2%||7.3%|
|ER at Maximum sustainable production (%)||56%||76%||68%|
a Excludes data for 1951 (see text).
Schubert et al. (2002) similarly estimated the probability of extinction using quasi-extinction thresholds of 50 and 100 effective adult spawners in any consecutive four year period (one cycle) to avoid the need to explicitly consider the potential for depensatory population dynamics that may increase the risk of extinction at low population sizes. Although somewhat arbitrary, these demographic extinction thresholds probably approximate the level below which recovery is unlikely. The US National Marine Fisheries Service uses similar thresholds to conduct extinction assessments for salmon (R. Waples, pers. comm.). Extinction probability is highly dependent on several factors, including the levels of PSM and ER, the time frame over which the projections are made, and the threshold of extinction used (Table 6). In this discussion, updated input data is used and consideration is limited to the 100 fish quasi-extinction threshold because, although the lower threshold reduces the short-term probability of extinction, it has little impact over longer time frames. The probability of extinction increases with increasing PSM and capture. If PSM’s remain at 90% or more, even in the absence of fishing, the probability of extinction is 50% in three generations (12 years) and increases to 98% and 100% over longer time frames of 10 (40 years) and 25 generations (100 years), respectively.
The simulation model results may underestimate the full probability of extinction of Cultus sockeye because the persistence of the large dominant cycle significantly reduces the probability that escapements will fall below the quasi-extinction threshold in any four-year period. Under conditions of high PSM, the population will be maintained increasingly by a single year-class. While five-year-old spawners from the dominant cycle can potentially repopulate subsequent cycles, the genetic diversity of the population would likely be reduced and population resiliency compromised. Furthermore, the relatively conservative quasi-extinction threshold may underestimate the impact of Allee effects, demographic stochasticity and genetic effects given the dense lake predator populations and the encroachment onto the spawning grounds by watermilfoil.
|Average future escapement in:|
|40%||0%||13 500||31 720||49 830||52 160|
|10%||10 760||24 590||42 410||45 880|
|20%||8 060||18 380||33 670||38 620|
|30%||5 930||12 720||24 820||30 750|
|40%||3 990||8 080||15 700||21 460|
|50%||2 540||4 450||8 120||11 490|
|50%||0%||8 870||20 260||36 330||40 880|
|10%||6 920||15 390||29 340||34 640|
|20%||5 170||10 990||21 390||27 540|
|30%||3 700||7 350||14 360||19 760|
|40%||2 500||4 450||7 940||11 420|
|50%||1 530||2 320||3 660||4 600|
|60%||0%||5 160||11 110||21 600||27 520|
|10%||3 940||8 070||15 860||21 470|
|20%||2 930||5 570||10 420||14 800|
|30%||2 060||3 540||6 150||8 490|
|40%||1 370||2 050||2 960||3 580|
|50%||820||1 010||1 130||930|
|70%||0%||2 520||4 450||8 150||11 610|
|10%||1 890||3 080||5 160||7 110|
|20%||1 390||2 010||2 980||3 540|
|30%||960||1 210||1 440||1 410|
|80%||0%||820||1 020||1 110||950|
Predictions are averaged across four years for 3, 5, 10 and 25 generations from the present (1999-2002) brood years. Note that, for 1999-2002, PSM averaged 61% and ER averaged 19%.
|PSM||ER||<50 spawners in 4 sucessive years|
(Generations from present)
|<100 spawners in 4 successive years|
(Generations from present)
Quasi-extinction is defined as the probability that spawner abundance will be less than 50 or 100 adult spawners in four successive years based on a forward simulation in Population Viability Analysis (from Schubert et al. 2002).
Fraser River sockeye have been managed in an intensive, integrated international and domestic system for over half a century. In the area specified under Treaty with the United States (US) (roughly encompassing Juan de Fuca Strait, southern Strait of Georgia, and southwest coast of Vancouver Island), the Pacific Salmon Commission (PSC) manages sockeye fisheries bilaterally. In other areas, they are managed domestically by Canada or the US. The PSC’s Fraser River Panel develops fishing plans for each of the four run groups by considering the escapement (surviving adults) goals, pre-season forecasts, and constraints such as by-catch of other species or stocks of concern. Within each group the larger populations are actively managed, the smaller populations generally not. Because the Cultus population is small relative to co-migrating populations such as Adams and Weaver, it has not been managed as a discrete population throughout the history of the Fraser River sockeye fishery. On the 1998 and 1999 cycles, the late run fisheries are actively managed to achieve gross escapement and catch objectives for the dominant and sub-dominant Adams River population-group; on the 2000 and 2001 cycles, they are managed to achieve similar objectives for the Weaver Creek sockeye, especially since 1969 with the first returns of enhanced sockeye to the artificial spawning channel. In addition, earlier marine area fisheries directed at the summer run also harvest late run sockeye. The cumulative impacts of the directed harvest of the numerically dominant summer and late run stocks determine the harvest and exploitation rate patterns of Cultus sockeye.
Because Cultus sockeye are not actively managed, the cycle-specific ER patterns differ depending on the target stock that triggers management actions. On the 1998 sub-dominant and 1999 dominant cycles (Adams management), Cultus ER’s averaged 71% and 77%, respectively (Table 3). Sub-dominant cycle ER’s have been generally high and relatively lacking in trends since 1954, while dominant cycle ER’s have decreased slightly since 1971. On the 2000 and 2001 off-cycles, the fisheries are actively managed for Weaver sockeye, where the wild stock has been augmented with enhanced production since the spawning channel began operation in 1965. Off-cycle ER’s are similar to those on the other cycles, averaging 67% (2000) and 70% (2001); however, the trends are considerably different. Before the first return of enhanced sockeye in 1969, ER’s averaged 57% (2000 cycle) and 65% (2001 cycle). After enhancement and until fisheries were reduced to address concerns regarding the early migration, ER’s increased to an average of 83% (2000 cycle) and 81% (2001 cycle) with slight increasing trends of 2.0% and 0.5% per cycle on the 2000 and 2001 cycles, respectively.
The mean exploitation rate at maximum sustained yield (MSY) for Cultus sockeye is estimated at 56%. However, exploitation rates have far exceeded this level in most years and on all cycles. Long-term cycle-specific average exploitation rates have ranged from 67-77%. Annual exploitation rates have frequently exceeded 80% and sometimes 90%. Exploitation rates on the two off-cycles increased from about 60% in the 1960’s to over 80% in subsequent decades as a result of increased fishing pressure to capture enhanced Weaver sockeye. It is likely that the sustained decline in the number of adults entering Cultus Lake on three cycles result from the excessive capture rates applied to Cultus sockeye almost continuously over four or more decades.
Cultus sockeye normally hold in the lake for up to two months before breeding. The migration into the lake typically begins in late September, peaks in October to mid November and ends by late December (Fig. 9). From 1996 to 2002, the migration into the lake has become progressively earlier to the extent that, by 2001, the start and peak of the migration were almost two months earlier than the 1941-1995 average (Appendix 2). The early migration into the lake has important implications to the population. It exposes the fish to water temperatures as high as 25ºC (DFO, unpublished data). Exposure to such temperatures, even for short periods, increases metabolic rates and the growth of bacteria and fungi, reduces reproductive hormone synthesis and the energy available for migration and reproduction, decreases swimming performance and delays gonadal maturation, all of which can contribute to increased pre-spawning mortality and reduced spawning success (Dave Patterson, DFO, pers. comm.). The temperature gradients between the Chilliwack River (12-16ºC), Sweltzer Creek (>20ºC) and the lake's hypolimnion (6.5ºC) may exacerbate these impacts. As well, upper Sweltzer Creek is heavily used for swimming and unstructured recreation in August and early September; activities that may further delay migration, increasing the exposure to high temperatures and the stress on returning fish.
Mortality increased in the late 1990’s to a level in excess of 90% of the returning adults (Appendix 1). Studies of Cultus and other late run populations indicate that the prespawn mortality results from longer than normal exposures to the parasite Parvicapsula minibicornis caused by the abnormally early migration into freshwater. Although considerable effort is being expended to identify the cause of the early migration, neither its occurrence nor severity can be predicted. Its effect on Cultus sockeye has been an unsustainable loss of reproductive potential. To illustrate this point, at current marine survivals (7%) and high prespawn mortality (93%) levels, each successful adult spawner must produce over 400 smolts to sustain the population. This is over six times the level of smolt production that has been observed in the last three brood years. Under these conditions, even if capture by the fisheries is limited to the lowest possible levels, this population is likely to decline to extinction within ten generations (about 40 years).
The long period of high capture rates coupled with elevated prespawn mortality has reduced Cultus sockeye to very low levels of abundance; three of the four cycles are at significant risk of loss. This leaves the population vulnerable to random changes in the freshwater and marine environments that otherwise might be benign for larger populations. For example, El Nino events (sudden increase in ocean water temperatures that lead to decreased productivity) occur frequently and can substantially reduce the marine survival of this population. The recurrence of a series of El Ninos, such as those of the 1990’s, could reduce marine survivals to levels that, even if the migration returned to normal and capture rates were limited to low levels, would pose a serious threat to this population. The population is also vulnerable to climate changes that affect the freshwater environment. For example, random temperature changes can affect phytoplankton communities, impacting sockeye food sources and lake water clarity. The latter can promote the growth of the Eurasian water milfoil populations that compete with sockeye for space on the spawning grounds. Other changes can favour predator populations and seriously reduce sockeye freshwater survival. The population is vulnerable to catastrophic events such as landslides that can destroy spawning areas or prevent adult sockeye from accessing the lake.
The important impact on adults of protracted exposures to the parasite Parvicapsula minibicornis has been discussed. A second parasite, the copepod Salmincola californiensis, is endemic in Cultus Lake and is known to infect and cause mortality in juvenile sockeye salmon (Kabata and Cousens 1977). Foerster (1929c) reported a heavy infestation of the 1927 smolt migration; similar levels were observed in 2002 (S. Barnetson, DFO, Inch Creek Hatchery, pers. comm.). The impact of this parasite on the survival of Cultus sockeye fry and smolts is unknown; however, the level of infestation is sufficiently severe that it may present a threat to the population at current low abundance levels.
Cultus Lake is home to a number of predator species, including coho, trout, sculpins, Dolly Varden char and northern pikeminnows (Ricker 1941). The highly abundant northern pikeminnow likely has the greatest impact on sockeye. A large piscivorous cyprinid widely distributed throughout the Fraser River and other major British Columbia river systems, the pikeminnow is an important source of mortality for juvenile salmonids (Foerster and Ricker 1941; Ricker 1941; Foerster 1968; Friesen and Ward 1999). In Cultus Lake, pikeminnows spawn along the lakeshore from late June to mid-July. Their fecundity (up to 40 000 eggs/female) and long life span (up to 20 years) allows populations to increase rapidly under favourable conditions. Young pikeminnow inhabit the littoral zone where they consume mostly insect larvae. When mature (>250 mm), they occupy both the littoral and limnetic (or sublittoral) zones and feed almost entirely on smaller fish, including juvenile sockeye and pikeminnow.
In the 1930’s, the freshwater survival of sockeye increased by 300% (from 3.1 to 10.0%) when pikeminnow were partially eradicated. In the 1990’s, survivals increased by 43% (from 70 to 100 smolts/spawner) following a similar predator control project. The recent decline in the Cultus sockeye spawner population has had the effect of placing very small fry populations in a predator-rich environment. Because predation is one mechanism in the depensatory population dynamics of collapsed stocks, the large predator population in Cultus Lake is an important potential threat to the recovery of this sockeye population.
Cultus Lake is heavily impacted by Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum), an exotic perennial macrophyte that was introduced to eastern North America in the late 1800’s (Reed 1977). It spreads widely and rapidly, displacing native plants, slowing water flows and changing fish habitats to the detriment of some species (e.g., salmon) and the benefit of others (e.g., pikeminnow). Watermilfoil propagates mainly by fragmentation but also by root nodes and seed production. In the littoral zone of lakes, it establishes dense patches with up to 100 stems growing from a single large root mass. The dense stem masses affect adult sockeye by preventing access to spawning habitats while providing juvenile pikeminnow with refuges against adult cannibalism (R. Gregory, DFO, pers. comm.), thereby increasing adult pikeminnow recruitment and potential predation on juvenile sockeye. Watermilfoil was first observed in Cultus Lake in 1977, likely an inadvertent introduction from interior lakes by boaters (R. Truelson, MOE, pers. comm; D. Barnes, DFO, pers. comm.). From 1977 to 1991, its distribution in the littoral zone nearly doubled and shifted from mainly sparse patches to dense mats. By 1991, it covered 22 ha of the lake’s 74 ha littoral area (Truelson 1992); subsequent distributions have not been monitored. Dive surveys on Lindell Beach in 1982 indicated that dense patches of watermilfoil had displaced sockeye from areas that had previously been used for spawning (K. Morton, DFO, pers. comm.). In recent years, watermilfoil removal projects have limited the species’ density on recreational beaches, including Lindell Beach; however, those projects are expected to terminate in 2003. Watermilfoil is probably an important threat to Cultus sockeye because it both provides habitat for predator species and encroaches on sockeye spawning habitat.
The Cultus watershed is heavily developed for recreational, residential and agricultural uses, resulting in significant impacts to tributary and outlet streams and lake foreshore habitats. The impacts from forest harvesting are probably minor; logging occurs only in the Frosst Creek headwaters in the United States. Housing is restricted to small areas on the northeast and northwest sides of the lake and at Lindell Beach. Farming occurs near the south end, and tree harvesting has occurred in the upland areas. Activities with direct impacts to the lake’s littoral zone include the removal of shoreline vegetation, shoreline alteration and the encroachment by wharves and piers, especially on the Lindell Beach spawning area. Activities that impact the tributary streams include channelization and the removal of riparian vegetation. Of special concern is the potential degradation of the quality of the lake’s surface and ground water inputs as a result of seepage from septic systems, agricultural runoff and the domestic use of fertilizers. Recreation is the primary activity in the watershed. Cultus Lake became popular for camping and outdoor recreation in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, leading to the creation of Cultus Lake Park in 1924. Today, 92% of the lake’s 18 km shoreline is within either Cultus Lake Provincial Park (656 ha along the east and west shores) or Cultus Lake Municipal Park (244 ha along the north shore). Park usage grew steadily through the twentieth century. The parks currently receive about 1.5 million visitors annually, making Cultus one of the most heavily utilized lakes in British Columbia. During the summer, the lake is extremely popular for recreational boating. Recreational fishing for any species is not common, although in recent years there have been annual derbies to remove Northern pikeminnow.
The impact of these activities on the sockeye population is unclear. Comparisons of limnological information from 2001 with that collected in the 1930's and 1960's suggest that the lake’s limnetic habitat has changed relatively little over the past 65 years. However, limited information is available regarding changes in the quality and quantity of groundwater and the effect of siltation or pollutants on habitat quality.
Sockeye salmon is an economically important species that is broadly distributed in north Pacific marine and freshwater environments. They comprise about 14% of the total salmon captured and killed in the North Pacific Ocean (Burgner 1991). Since 1952, the capture of Fraser sockeye has ranged from 1-18 million per year; the capture of Cultus sockeye has ranged from a low of 100 adults to a high of 235 thousand adults.
Biologically, Cultus sockeye are a genetically distinct, locally adapted population that is unique to Cultus Lake and, as such, represent a Nationally Significant Population. The Cultus population is a keystone species for the local ecosystem because, like other anadromous salmon species, it is the principle mechanism for the transport of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus from marine to freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Cultus sockeye are being considered for selection as an indicator species for ecosystem sustainability monitoring (Fraser Basin Council 2002). Ecologically, Cultus sockeye are one of 18 fish species known to utilize this lake for all or part of their life cycles.
The Cultus population is also significant from a scientific perspective because it is one of the best-studied salmon populations in the world. From the perspective of science history, it was the first to be assessed for smolt production, it was the site of the first system-wide evaluation of enhancement that resulted in the termination of the federal hatchery system in 1935, and it was studied by two of Canada’s most internationally famous scientists, R.E. Foerster and W.E. Ricker, when they formulated many of the concepts that today guide fishery science around the world. It is also significant due to its long-term data set; such data are becoming increasingly important to the understanding of events on a decadal or longer scale.
Cultus sockeye are also of significance to human culture. They are especially important to the Soowahlie Band of the Sto:lo First Nation. This band occupies the land that borders both sides of Sweltzer Creek, the sole access to Cultus Lake. The presence of sockeye in Cultus Lake was a principle determinant in the Band’s settlement of the area and played a role in their survival for thousands of years. Today, the sockeye continue to be of cultural and spiritual importance to the community. Sockeye are featured on the band totem and in the band’s expressions and dances; they are important to the band’s economic opportunities for the future. The current Chief, Doug Kelly, was a co-petitioner (with Ken Wilson) in 2002 of the COSEWIC emergency assessment of Cultus sockeye.
An extensive framework of international commitments and domestic legislation is in place to protect Pacific salmon populations. Internationally, as a signatory to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, Canada is required to develop legislation and policies to protect ecosystems and habitats and maintain viable species populations. Domestically, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Act (1985) enabled the creation of a federal department with the mandate for conservation and sustained use of fisheries resources in marine and freshwaters. The Fisheries Act (1985) and other supporting legislation provide a legal framework for the control of fisheries, pollution and habitat. Federal-provincial agreements such as the Agreement on the Management of Pacific Salmon (1997) and the Agreement on Inter-jurisdictional Cooperation (1999) coordinate intergovernmental activities with the objective to maintain ecologically sustainable fish resources and habitats. Provincial and municipal governments also regulate land and water use activities that can affect fish populations. For example, the B.C. Water Act (1996) governs the allocation of water and the regulation of works in streams. More recently, the Canada Oceans Act (1996) requires that marine resources be managed to conserve biological diversity and commits Canada to the application of the Precautionary Principle for wildlife including fishes.
The DFO is the primary organization responsible for Pacific salmon. Its New Directions Policy (1998) acknowledged the importance of Pacific salmon to Canadian society and articulated a series of principles guiding their conservation and sustainable use. Three of the principles are of particular importance to the protection of Cultus sockeye: first, conservation is the primary objective of the Department and takes precedence; second, the precautionary approach will be applied to fishery management; and third, the long term productivity of the resource will not be compromised by short term issues. One of the components of the New Directions policy framework is the draft Wild Salmon Policy (2000). This policy is intended to promote the long-term viability of Pacific salmon populations and their natural habitats. After implementation, it will provide additional protection to genetically distinct populations or groups of populations designated as conservation units.
Since summer 2001, Cultus sockeye have been managed under measures implemented to address the risk posed by the mortality associated with the early migration of late run sockeye. The Fraser Panel, a joint Canada/U.S. body responsible for the management of Fraser River sockeye in waters specified by the Pacific Salmon Treaty (1985), reached in 2001 a bilateral agreement to limit the exploitation rate on late run sockeye to a maximum of 17%. Further to the agreement was the provision that Canadian and US fishers were not to exceed a 60% harvest rate on summer run sockeye due to the presence of co-migrating late run populations. In 2002, bilateral agreement was reached to further limit the total fishery exploitation rate of late run sockeye to a ceiling of 15%. In 2003, bilateral agreement was reached to limit the exploitation rate to a range of 15-25%, depending on the abundance of late run sockeye and the extent of the early migration. Inseason information indicates that the exploitation rate (25%) will exceed the appropriate limit (15%). The impact on Cultus sockeye will be reviewed following the release of final estimates of the number of adults that entered Cultus Lake and the level of prespawn mortality.
Sockeye salmon is one of seven species of the genus Oncorhynchus native to North America. This status report evaluates the genetically distinct sockeye population that occupies Cultus Lake, located in the coastal lowland portion of the Fraser River watershed in British Columbia. Cultus sockeye are genetically distinct from other sockeye populations in the Fraser River and in other parts of their global range. The population serves as a keystone species for the local ecosystem, and is scientifically important both from the perspective of science history as well as the long time series of assessment data available for the population and its habitat. The population is important to many segments of Canadian society, and is fundamental to the well-being of the Soowahlie Band and the Sto:lo First Nation.
Cultus sockeye utilize Cultus Lake for breeding, egg incubation and the rearing of juveniles. It is a small (6.3 km2 surface area) monomictic lake with a high seasonal average photosynthetic rate and a productive zooplankton community that is an exceptional food resource for juvenile sockeye. The watershed is heavily developed for recreational, residential and agricultural uses, with recreation predominant. Cultus sockeye mature primarily in their fourth year of life - after almost two years in freshwater and more than two years in marine environments. Adults migrate from the open ocean into the Strait of Georgia in August where they remain for up to eight weeks. Normally, they resume their migration into the Fraser River and Cultus Lake in September and continue migrating into the lake until December. Recently, the onset of the riverine migration has been earlier and has resulted in elevated mortality levels.
The numbers of Cultus sockeye adults are known since 1925. Abundance was generally strong but variable until the late 1960’s, when spawner numbers collapsed in two cycles and began a sustained decline in a third cycle. Since the early 1990’s, abundance has declined dramatically on all four cycles; the most recent populations on all cycles have been among the lowest ever observed. In the last three generations (12 years; 1991-2002), the adult spawner population declined by 36%, a rate of 3.3% per year across all cycles. When recent increases in prespawn mortality are considered, the rate of decline in the population’s reproductive potential (effective spawners) over the last three generations is 92%. Current population levels are a small fraction of the most conservative estimate of the productive capacity of the population. Similar declines have been recorded in assessments of the fry and smolt populations and the total adult return.
Over-exploitation by the fisheries, recent increases in the level of prespawn mortality associated with the early migration, and reductions in marine survival from the El Nino events in the 1990’s have contributed to the collapse of this population. Changes in freshwater habitat may have played a contributing role but are unlikely to be a primary factor in the collapse. Capture and killing of Cultus sockeye in the fishery has exceeded sustainable levels almost continuously for over four decades. Capture has averaged 67% and has frequently exceeded 80%, and even 90%, of the adult population when sustainable levels would be less than 56%. From 1995 to 2002, the migration of adult Cultus and other late run sockeye from the Strait of Georgia into the Fraser River has been progressively earlier. While the cause of the early migration is unknown, its consequences have been dramatic. The early migration of adults has been associated with high levels of adult mortality along the freshwater migratory route and high mortality in the lake before spawning. These mortalities are caused by heavy infestations of Parvicapsula minibicornis, a parasite that attacks the kidneys and gills (St-Hilaire et al. 2001). Although the parasite occurs in most Fraser River sockeye populations, it has caused significant mortality only among early migrating late-run sockeye, including Cultus sockeye.
The outlook for Cultus Lake sockeye is uncertain. Its persistence will depend on whether the early migration phenomenon continues in the future, on the level of capture and killing by the fisheries, on marine survival conditions, and on habitat conditions. Current low levels of abundance leave it vulnerable to random changes in the marine and freshwater environments, endemic parasites such as Salmincola californiensis, abundant lake predator populations and anthropogenic factors that could reduce the population’s productivity when abundances are low, thus increasing the probability of extinction. If prespawn mortality exceeds 90%, and without any killing by the fisheries, the probability of extinction of the population is estimated to be 50% in three generations (12 years) and 100% in 25 generations (100 years).
Population name: Cultus Lake sockeye
Range of Occurrence in Canada: B.C. (Cultus Lake, Fraser River system)
Extent and Area Information
|extent of occurrence (km2) (Watershed area)||83 km2|
|specify trend (decline, stable, increasing, unknown)||Stable|
|are there extreme fluctuations in EO (> 1 order of magnitude)?||No|
|area of occupancy (km2) (Lake area)||6.3 km2|
|specify trend (decline, stable, increasing, unknown)||Decline|
|are there extreme fluctuations in AO (> 1 order magnitude)?||Unknown|
|number of extant locations||One|
|specify trend in # locations (decline, stable, increasing, unknown)||Stable|
|are there extreme fluctuations in # locations (>1 order of magnitude)?||No|
|habitat trend: specify declining, stable, increasing or unknown trend in area, extent or quality of habitat||Probably declining|
|generation time (average age of parents in the population)||Four years|
|number of mature individuals (capable of reproduction) in the Canadian population||50-1200 spawners|
|total population trend: specify declining, stable, increasing or unknown trend in number of mature individuals||Declining|
|if decline,% decline over the last 10 years or 3 generations, whichever is greater||92% in three generations (12 years)|
|are there extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals (> 1 order of magnitude)?||Yes|
|is the total population severely fragmented (most individuals found within small and relatively isolated (geographically or otherwise) populations between which there is little exchange, i.e., ≤ 1 successful migrant / year)?||One population – Cultus is genetically and demographically isolated from all other sockeye populations|
|list each population and the number of mature individuals in each||N/A|
|specify trend in number of populations (decline, stable, increasing, unknown)||N/A|
|are there extreme fluctuations in number of populations (>1 order of magnitude)?||N/A|
Threats (actual or imminent threats to populations or habitats)
Rescue Effect (immigration from an outside source)
|does species exist elsewhere (in Canada or outside)?||Yes|
|status of the outside population(s)?||Variable|
|is immigration known or possible?||No – Cultus is a distinct population.|
|would immigrants be adapted to survive here?||No|
|is there sufficient habitat for immigrants here?||NA|
Much of the information and text contained in this status report has been previously released in reports of the Cultus Sockeye Recovery Team’s work groups and in a Canadian Stock Assessment Secretariat status report that is currently under revision for the Pacific Science Advice Review Committee. I am grateful for the contribution of my fellow work group and PSARC team members: D. Barnes, T. Beacham, S. Barnetson, A. Cass, T. Cone, R. Devlin, B. Fanos, M. Foy, J.Gable, J. Grout, J. Hume, M. Johnson, D. Lofthouse, D. MacKinlay, K. Morton, K. Shortreed, M. Staley, B. Stanton, A. Stobart, R. Valor, R. Withler and C. Wood. I am grateful for constructive comments on drafts of documents provided by M. Bradford, G. Brown, B. Holtby and J. Woodey. A thorough review of the current document by M. Gross was particularly useful in improving the quality of this status report.
Funding for this status report was provided by the Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada.
Aro, K.V. 1979. Transfers of eggs and young of Pacific Salmon within British Columbia. Fish. Mar. Serv. Tech. Rep. 861: 147 p.
Bickham, J.W., Wood, C.C., and Patton, J.C. 1995. Biogeographic implications of cytochrome b sequences and allozymes in sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka). J. Hered. 86: 140-144.
Bradford, M.J., Pyper, B., and Shortreed, K.S. 2000. Biological responses of sockeye salmon to the fertilization of Chilko Lake, a large lake in the interior of British Columbia. N. Am. J. Fish Manage. 20: 661-671.
Brannon, E.L. 1967. Genetic control of migration behavior of newly emerged sockeye salmon fry. International Pacific Salmon Fisheries Commission Progress Report No. 16: 31 p.
Brannon, E.L. 1987. Mechanisms stabilizing salmonid fry emergence timing. Pp 120-124 In: H.D. Smith, L. Margolis, and C.C. Wood, (eds.). Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population biology and future management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 96.
Burgner, R.L. 1991. Life history of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). In: C. Groot, and L. Margolis, (eds.). Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver, Canada.
Cannings S.G., and Ptolemy, J. 1998. Rare freshwater fish of British Columbia. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, Victoria, B.C. 214 pp.
Cannings S.G., Fraser, D., and Munro, W.T. 1994. Provincial lists of species at risk. Pp. 16-23 In: L.E. Harding and E. McCullum, (eds.). Biodiversity in British Columbia. Canadian Wildlife Service, Delta, B.C.
Cooper, A.C. 1952. Downstream migrant study Cultus Lake. Int. Pac. Salmon Fish. Comm., unpublished. 12 p.
DFO. 1998. Discussion paper: a new direction for Canada’s Pacific salmon fisheries. Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Available from: http://www-comm.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/english/publications/alloc/st9808e.htm.
DFO. 2000. Wild salmon policy: a discussion paper (draft). Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Available from: http://www-comm.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/development/wsp-sep-consult/wsp/wsp1.htm.
Foerster, R.E. 1925. Studies in the ecology of the sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Contrib. Can. Biol. 2: 335-422.
Foerster, R.E. 1929a. An investigation of the life history and propagation of the sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) at Cultus Lake, British Columbia. No. 1. Introduction and the run of 1925. Contributions to Canadian Biology and Fisheries 5 (1): 3-35.
Foerster, R.E. 1929b. An investigation of the life history and propagation of the sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) at Cultus Lake, British Columbia. No. 2. The run of 1926. Contributions to Canadian Biology and Fisheries 5 (2): 39-53.
Foerster, R.E. 1929c. An investigation of the life history and propagation of the sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) at Cultus Lake, British Columbia. No. 3. The downstream migration of the young in 1926 and 1927. Contributions to Canadian Biology and Fisheries 5 (3): 57-82.
Foerster, R.E. 1934. An investigation of the life history and propagation of the sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) at Cultus Lake, British Columbia. No. 4. The life history cycle of the 1925 year class with natural propagation. Contributions to Canadian Biology and Fisheries 8 (27): 345-355.
Foerster, R.E. 1936. An investigation of the life history and propagation of the sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) at Cultus Lake, British Columbia. No. 5. The life history cycle of the 1926 year class with artificial propagation involving the liberation of free-swimming fry. J. Biol. Bd. Can. 2 (3): 311-333.
Foerster, R.E. 1938. An investigation of the relative efficiencies of natural and artificial propagation of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) at Cultus Lake, British Columbia. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 4 (3): 151-161.
Foerster, R.E. 1954. On the relation of adult sockeye salmon returns to known seaward migrations. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 11:339-350.
Foerster, R.E. 1968. The sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Fish. Res. Board Can. Bull. 162. Ottawa.
Foerster, R.E., and Ricker, W.E. 1941. The effect of reduction of predaceous fish on survival of young sockeye salmon a Cultus Lake. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 5 (4): 315-336.
Fraser Basin Council. 2002. Fish and wildlife indicator concept paper. Unpublished discussion paper released 28-August. 4 p.
Friesen, T.A., and D.L. Ward. 1999. Management of northern pikeminnow and implications for juvenile salmonid survival in the lower Columbia and Snake rivers. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 19: 406-420.
Gardner, J., and Peterson, D.L. 2003. Making sense of the salmon aquaculture debate. Prepared for the Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council. 152 p.
Goodlad, J.C., Gjernes, T.W., and Brannon, E.L. 1974. Factors affecting sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) growth in four lakes of the Fraser River system. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 31: 871-892.
Gustafson, R.G., Wainwright, T.C., Winans, G.A., Waknitz, F.W., Parker, L.T., and Waples, R.S. 1997. Status review of sockeye salmon from Washington and Oregon. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-33. 282 p.
Hall, D.L. 1992. Summary of the 1991 and 1992 squawfish removal program, Cultus Lake British Columbia. Unpublished manuscript. 30 p.
Hart, J.L. 1973. Pacific fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 180, 740 p.
Hartman, W.L., and Burgner, R.L. 1972. Limnology and fish ecology of sockeye salmon nursery lakes of the world. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 29: 699-715.
Healey, M.C. 1980. The ecology of juvenile salmon in Georgia Strait, British Columbia. In: W.J. McNeil and D.C. Himsworth (eds.). Salmonid ecosystems of the North Pacific. Oregon State University Press.
Howard, G.V. 1948. A study of the tagging method in the enumeration of sockeye salmon populations, p. 9-66 In: Problems in enumeration of populations of spawning sockeye salmon. International Pacific Salmon Fisheries Commission, Bulletin II.
Hume, J.B., Shortreed, K.S., and Morton, K.F. 1996. Juvenile sockeye rearing capacity of three lakes in the Fraser River system. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 719-733.
Jeppson, P.A., and Platts, W.S. 1959. Ecology and control of Columbia squawfish in northern Idaho lakes. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 88: 197-202.
Kabata, Z., and Cousens, B. 1977. Host-parasite relationships between sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka, and Salmincola californiensis (Copepoda: Lernaeopodidae). J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 34: 191-202.
Levy, D.A. 1990. Feasibility of selective squawfish removal for sockeye salmon enhancement in Cultus Lake, British Columbia. Unpublished manuscript. 31 p.
Lewis, P. O., and Zaykin, D. 2001. Genetic Data Analysis: Computer program for the analysis of allelic data. Version 1.0 (d16c). Free internet program from http://lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/software.html.
Miller, K.M., Kaukinen, K.H., Beacham, T.D., and Withler, R.E. 2001. Geographic heterogeneity in natural selection of an MHC locus in sockeye salmon. Genetica 111: 237-257.
Mueller, C.W., and Enzenhofer, H.J. 1991. Trawl catch statistics in sockeye rearing lakes of the Fraser River drainage basin: 1975-1985. Can. Data Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. No. 825.
Northcote, T.G., and Larkin, P.A. 1956. Indicators of productivity in British Columbia lakes. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 13(4): 515-540.
Northcote, T.G., and Larkin, P.A. 1989. The Fraser River: a major salmonine production system, p. 172-204. In: D.P. Dodge, (ed.). Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium (LARS). Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 106: 629 p.
Reed, C. F. 1977. History and distribution of Eurasian watermilfoil in United States and Canada. Phytologia 36: 417-436.
Ricker, W.E. 1933. Destruction of sockeye salmon by predatory fishes. Biol Bd. Canada, Pacific Prog. Rept. No. 18, 3-4.
Ricker, W.E. 1935. Studies of the limnological factors affecting the propagation and survival of the sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in Cultus Lake, British Columbia. PhD. Thesis, University of Toronto.
Ricker, W.E. 1937. Physical and chemical characteristics of Cultus Lake, British Columbia. J. Biol. Bd. Can. 3 (4): 363-402.
Ricker, W.E. 1938a. “Residual” and kokanee salmon in Cultus Lake. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 4 (3): 192-218.
Ricker, W.E. 1938b. Seasonal and annual variations in quantity of pelagic net plankton, Cultus Lake, British Columbia. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 4: 33-47.
Ricker, W.E. 1938c. A comparison of seasonal growth rates of young sockeye salmon and young squawfish in Cultus Lake. Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Progress Reports of the Pacific Biological Station 36: 3-5.
Ricker, W.E. 1941. The consumption of young sockeye salmon by predaceous fish. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 5: 293-313.
Ricker, W.E. 1952. Numerical relations between abundance of predators and survival of prey. Can. Fish. Culturist No. 3: 5-9.
Ricker, W.E. 1959. Additional observations concerning residual sockeye and kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka). J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 16(6): 897-902.
Schubert, N.D. 1998. The 1994 Fraser River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) escapement. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2201: 62 p.
Schubert, N.D., Beacham, T. D., Cass, A.J., Cone, T.E., Fanos, B.P., Foy, M., Gable, J.H., Grout, J.A., Hume, J.M.B., Johnson, M., Morton, K.F., Shortreed, K.S., and Staley, M.J. 2002. Status of Cultus Lake sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Pacific Science Advice Review Committee Paper. Accepted, under revision.
Shortreed, K.S., Hume, J.M.B., and Stockner, J.G. 2000. Using photosynthetic rates to estimate the juvenile sockeye salmon rearing capacity of British Columbia lakes, p. 505-521 In: E.E. Knudsen, C.R. Steward, D.D. MacDonald, J.E. Williams, and D.W. Reiser, (eds). Sustainable fisheries management: Pacific salmon. CRC Press LLC.
Shortreed, K.S., K.F. Morton, K. Malange, and Hume, J.M.B. 2001. Factors limiting juvenile sockeye production and enhancement potential for selected B.C. nursery lakes. Can. Stock. Ass. Sec. Res. Doc. 098.
St-Hilaire, S., Burrows, S.M., Higgins, M., Barnes, D., Devlin, R., Withler, R., Khattra, J., Jones, S., and Kieser, D. 2001. Epidemiology of Parvicapsula minibicornis in Fraser River sockeye salmon. Unpublished.
Truelson, R.L. 1992. Control of Eurasian watermilfoil in Cultus Lake 1991. B.C. Ministry of Environment. Unpublished manuscript.
Waples, R.S. 1991. Definition of “species” under the Endangered Species Act: application to Pacific Salmon. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/NWC-194.
Williams, I.V. 1987. Attempts to reestablish sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) populations in the upper Adams River, British Columbia, 1949-84. Pp 235-242 In: H.D. Smith, L. Margolis, and C.C. Wood, (eds.). Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population biology and future management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 96.
Withler, R.E. 1982. Transplanting Pacific salmon. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1079.
Withler, R.E., Le, K.D., Nelson, J. Miller, K.M., and Beacham, T.D. 2000. Intact genetic structure and high levels of genetic diversity in bottlenecked sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) populations of the Fraser River, British Columbia, Canada. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57: 1985-1998.
Wood, C.C. 1995. Life history variation and population structure in sockeye salmon. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 17: 195-216.
Wood, C.C., Riddell, B.E., Rutherford, D.T., and Withler, R.E. 1994. Biochemical genetic survey of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in Canada. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51 (Suppl. 1): 114-131.
Mr. Schubert received his B.Sc. (Honours) from Simon Fraser University in 1976, from which he immediately began his career as a biologist with Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Mr. Schubert was a member of a number of joint Canada-U.S. technical committees in the 1980s and 1990s, served as a member of the Pacific Scientific Advice Review Committee in 1990-1994, and headed the Fraser River sockeye and pink salmon stock assessment team in 1994-2000. He is currently Chief of Stock Assessment for the Lower Fraser Area and is based in Delta, B.C. Mr. Schubert has authored 60 secondary publications.
1 FST, calculated from a correlation of genes across individuals within and among populations, indicates the degree of reproductive isolation of a population. The higher the FST value (maximum 1), the more closely individuals are related to each other within a population and the less to individuals in other populations.
2 Some MHC values may be due to common selective forces as this locus is under strong selection from disease and parasites.
| Next |
- Date Modified: